Discovering the Covalent Nature of S2Cl2: A Comprehensive Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter lorka150
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the chemical compound S2Cl2, specifically whether it is covalent or ionic. Participants explore the criteria for covalent bonding and the implications of the non-metallic nature of sulfur and chlorine.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether S2Cl2 is covalent, seeking clarification on the requirements for a bond to be classified as covalent.
  • Others note that both sulfur and chlorine are non-metals, which might suggest a covalent bond, but they also express uncertainty about the implications of this classification.
  • One participant reflects on their understanding that metals combined with non-metals typically form ionic bonds, leading them to initially question the nature of S2Cl2.
  • Another participant cautions against assumptions, pointing out that NH4Cl is ionic despite containing no metals, which complicates the classification of bonds based solely on the presence of non-metals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether S2Cl2 is covalent or ionic, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of definitions and assumptions regarding ionic and covalent bonding, indicating that the discussion may be limited by these factors.

lorka150
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Is S2Cl2 covalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lorka150 said:
Is S2Cl2 covalent?

What is required for a bond to be covalent? Does this bond appear ionic? sulphur and chlorine are both non-metals; what does this lead you to conclude?
 
i chose it because i know that metals + non-metals are ionic... and because they were both non-metals, it made me feel that way. also, i knew that ionic compounds were metal + polyatomic (and that wasn't that, either).
that was my assumption. i just like to make sure i didn't miss something, as i am not very chemistry savvy.
 
lorka150 said:
i chose it because i know that metals + non-metals are ionic... and because they were both non-metals, it made me feel that way. also, i knew that ionic compounds were metal + polyatomic (and that wasn't that, either).
that was my assumption. i just like to make sure i didn't miss something, as i am not very chemistry savvy.
Be careful with your assumptions. NH_{4}Cl is ionic, yet it contains no metals.
 

Similar threads

Chemistry Are S2Cl2 and SCl the Same Thing?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Shielding or principal quantum number predicts Covalent or Ionic?
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Can Covalent Bonds form between atoms with no electrons?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Equal electronegativities and covalent bond formation
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Chemistry Molecular Solid vs Network Covalent Solids
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Comparing Covalent Character of TiCl3 and TiCl4
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Maximum Covalent Bonds Formed by Carbon with Nitrogen?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Diamond oxidation -- covalent bonds
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
How many covalent bonds make a giant molecular structure?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
High School Covalent bonds in diamond
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K