Discrete Math Proof n^2 > n +1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the inequality n^2 > n + 1 for all natural numbers n greater than 1. Participants explore various approaches, including rewriting the inequality as n^2 - n - 1 > 0 and using the factorization n(n - 1) > 1. The proof is established by demonstrating that for n > 1, both n and (n - 1) are greater than or equal to 1, ensuring that their product exceeds 1. Induction is mentioned as an alternative method, although the proof is straightforward without it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural numbers and inequalities
  • Familiarity with mathematical proof techniques
  • Basic knowledge of algebraic manipulation
  • Concept of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore algebraic proof techniques for inequalities
  • Learn about the properties of natural numbers and their applications in proofs
  • Review examples of mathematical proofs involving quadratic expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying discrete mathematics, particularly those learning proof techniques, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching methodologies in mathematical reasoning.

Xuanwu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For any given n, where n is an element of the natural number set, prove n^2 > n +1, for all n > 1.

Homework Equations


This week in lecture we defined the greater than relationship as:

Let S = Natural numbers
Let R = {(a,b): \exists c: a = b+c}
then aRb



The Attempt at a Solution



My first thought was show a general expression of either an odd of even number (n = 2x + 1 or n = 2x), but the resultant (4x^2 + 4x +1 > 2x + 2 and 4x^2 > 2x +1 for odd/even respectively) doesn't really give me anything useful as far as I can see.

I can see that it would be true, as n = 2 would be 4 > 3, and n= 3 would be 9 > 4, I'm just not sure on how to get started.

Some literature on approaches to getting started on proofs would be great, as I find I'm fairly hit/miss. I can either see the approach or I stand there going "I know it's true, but I can't show it's true".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's one approach.

n^2-n = n(n-1)

n>1 thus (n-1)>=1, now n(n-1)>= n >1
 
Sorry, still not sure how having the form,

n(n-1) > 1 for all n > 1,

helps me in this?
 
One way to do it would be to rewrite it as n^2 - n -1 > 0, and show that that is true for n > 1
 
Hmm.. explain it to me like I'm 5. I last did math proof type subjects in '99, prior to this my degree has had calculus and stats which I had no issue with.
 
Xuanwu said:
Sorry, still not sure how having the form,

n(n-1) > 1 for all n > 1,

helps me in this?

See the previous post #2. The original inequality can be written as n2-n>1, as you can subtract the same amount from both sides of an inequality: for example, if a>b, a-1>b-1.

n2-n=n(n-1). So you have to prove that n(n-1)>1 if n>1 integer.
If n>1 n-1≥1. You multiply n with a number greater then 1. Will the result greater or less than n?

ehild
 
Alright, that makes sense. Issue is I'm not sure if this is the sort of proof I'm meant to be doing for it.

I think I'll go bang my head on a book.

Thanks.
 
Xuanwu said:
Alright, that makes sense. Issue is I'm not sure if this is the sort of proof I'm meant to be doing for it.

It is a proof and simple enough. If you want to apply the definition find that "c" >0 that makes (n+1)+c=n2. It is just the difference n2-(n+1), isn't it? You need to prove that n2-n-1>0.

ehild

EDITED!
 
Last edited:
ehild, you meant n^2-n-1>0 not n^2-n+1.

You can do this also by induction, though it's really easy without.
 
  • #10
MathematicalPhysicist said:
ehild, you meant n^2-n-1>0 not n^2-n+1.

Thank you, I corrected it.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K