Distance Between Atoms: How to Measure

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Legion81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to measure the distance between atoms, specifically in the context of a pure gold film. Participants explore various theoretical and experimental approaches to estimate atomic spacing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the periodic table and Avogadro's number to estimate atomic distances based on the weight of a mole of gold, but acknowledges the complexity of the task.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for a formula or table that provides atomic distances under specific conditions, indicating a lack of readily available resources.
  • One method proposed involves using X-ray diffraction to analyze the atomic structure, which is met with enthusiasm by another participant.
  • A suggestion is made to utilize Avogadro's law and Van der Waals radius from Wikipedia as a potential means to estimate atomic distances.
  • Scanning tunneling microscopy is mentioned as another technique for measuring atomic distances.
  • One participant proposes measuring heat properties and applying condensed matter formalism to determine lattice size, though they express uncertainty about the feasibility of this approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and methods for measuring atomic distances, with no consensus reached on a single approach. Uncertainty remains regarding the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Some methods discussed may depend on specific conditions such as temperature and pressure, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of certain techniques.

Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to find the distance between atoms? For example, if you have a pure gold film... how can you find out how far the gold atoms are spaced?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have an idea. Take a look at a periodic table of the elements and check out how much weight is worth a mole of the element you are trying to estimate its atoms distance. (Assume that your substance is free of all the other elements). Then as you know Avogadro's number, you know how many atoms there are in the "block" (or film as in your example) of the particular element (gold for you). Now it's getting a bit complex... hmm. I'm not sure it's as easy as I thought. Maybe by measuring the volume of your film it would be possible. Interesting question! I'll think on it more.
 
That was the approach I first thought of, but surely there is some formula or something to just plug some numbers into... Google didn't bring up any results when I searched, so I was hoping someone knew.

Does anyone know of a table or something that has atomic distances for materials? (at X temperature, X pressure, etc.)
 
humanino said:
One way is to shine it with X-rays and look at the diffraction pattern.

WOW... Thanks! I bet that would work, but I was actually wondering about something on paper. I was playing around with some ideas, then I realized I had no idea how to find the distance between 2 atoms. So as you can see, an experimental value isn't really an option for me. I need a way that fits my budget... which is about a package of ramen noodles! LOL! I guess I'm out of luck.
 
How about using good old fashioned chemistry (Avogadro's law, etc.)?

(Whoops, fluidistic beat me to it. :))

Check wikipedia. For at least some of the elements it gives you the Van der Waals radius which might be good enough for your purpuses.
 
I have to look it over, because I am not familiar with that. But I think by measuring the heat properties of your material, plus some condensed matter formalism, you should be able to determine the size of the lattice. I'm not completely positive because I don't remember all the hypothesis you need. Maybe Gokul could help us with that.

edit
Second thought, it is unlikely to work : you would probably need very high tempreatures.
 
peter0302 said:
How about using good old fashioned chemistry (Avogadro's law, etc.)?

(Whoops, fluidistic beat me to it. :))

Check wikipedia. For at least some of the elements it gives you the Van der Waals radius which might be good enough for your purpuses.

That should work just fine. Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K