Do Planck Units Remain Relevant Inside Black Holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relevance and application of Planck units within black holes, particularly focusing on whether these units are modified or remain unchanged in such extreme environments. Participants explore theoretical implications, the nature of singularities, and the fundamental constants involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Planck units apply inside black holes, suggesting that they are merely a choice of units similar to mks or cgs systems.
  • Others argue that the Planck length represents a scale where quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, which may not be analogous to conventional measurement systems.
  • A participant raises the issue of whether a black hole can actually attain a size of zero, proposing that if it cannot, then physics does not break down at the singularity.
  • Another participant asserts that black holes must have a non-zero radius, challenging the notion of a singularity having zero size.
  • Some contributions emphasize that the Planck length would only change if the fundamental constants (G, c, \hbar) change within a black hole, which is not a settled matter.
  • There is mention of Planck density as potentially relevant, with a participant noting it is large but not infinite.
  • Discussions also touch on the implications of a singularity, with some suggesting that the presence of "something" prevents the radius from being zero.
  • One participant insists that in General Relativity, the gravitational constant G does not change, while others propose that the breakdown of physics at the singularity is due to infinite curvature of spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability and implications of Planck units within black holes, particularly regarding the nature of singularities and the behavior of fundamental constants. No consensus is reached on these issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining physical properties at the singularity and the potential limitations of current theories in addressing these extreme conditions. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications of Planck units and the nature of singularities.

BernieM
Messages
280
Reaction score
6
Do Planck units apply inside of black holes? Are they modified? Or are they irrelevant? If some Planck units remain unchanged and applicable in black holes, which ones would those be?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
BernieM said:
Do Planck units apply inside of black holes? Are they modified? Or are they irrelevant? If some Planck units remain unchanged and applicable in black holes, which ones would those be?

Not sure what you mean, Planck units are just that, just a specific choice of units. The question is equivalent to asking if the mks or cgs unit system still applies within a black hole, which of course it does.
 
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example. I don't think that is analogous to other conventional systems of measurement. But rather than debate that, perhaps I can explain further the reason for the question. If the radius of a black hole = 0 then gravity is infinite and physics breaks down in essence. But is it actually possible for something that begins by posessing properties of size, mass, energy, etc., to actually attain a size of ZERO? And if it can not become ZERO in size then the radius of the black hole can never have a radius of zero and no actual breakdown in physics occurs. Well I hope this helps to understand my real question then.
 
black holes definitely have a non-zero radius, I'm not sure what you're trying to get at
 
BernieM said:
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example. I don't think that is analogous to other conventional systems of measurement.

The Planck length (or any other Planck unit) is simply defined as the collection of fundamental constants (speed of light, gravitational constant, fine structure constant, etc.) put together in the right combination to yield a quantity with dimension of length. It does indeed have physical meaning too, but the Planck length would only change inside a black hole if either [itex]G[/itex], [itex]c[/itex] or [itex]\hbar[/itex] changed inside a black hole.

But rather than debate that, perhaps I can explain further the reason for the question. If the radius of a black hole = 0 then gravity is infinite and physics breaks down in essence. But is it actually possible for something that begins by posessing properties of size, mass, energy, etc., to actually attain a size of ZERO? And if it can not become ZERO in size then the radius of the black hole can never have a radius of zero and no actual breakdown in physics occurs. Well I hope this helps to understand my real question then.

One possible meaning of the Planck length is that it is the smallest meaningful length scale, so that any object would at least have the size of the Planck length. This would preclude a black hole from having a size of zero. But this is far from a settled question.
 
I assume you are talking about the singularity as opposed to the event horizon. I'm not sure the Planck length is relevant, but, the Planck density may be. At 10^93 gm/cm^3 it is really big, but, not infinite.
 
Yes, I was not specific but I was referring to the singularity. I guess the problem I am having is that given that not even 'empty space' is ever truly empty, r could never = 0 as long as there is "something" there.
 
BernieM said:
Planck length is the length at which quantum indeterminacy becomes absolute, for example.

No, Planck length is defined as:
[tex] L_p \equiv \sqrt{\frac{G \hbar}{c^3}}[/tex]

Period! So, which one of these constants do you suspect to change within a black hole?
 
G. That's the problem if r=0 then G=[itex]\infty[/itex] or at least that's how I understand the dilemma of why physics breaks down in the singularity.
 
  • #10
BernieM said:
G. That's the problem if r=0 then G=[itex]\infty[/itex] or at least that's how I understand the dilemma of why physics breaks down in the singularity.

This is a terrible way to try to understand it. In Einstein's theory, the constant G is the constant G, end of discussion. It never changes. Other theories of gravity might have a G that varies, but not GR. What happens at the singularity is the curvature of spacetime is predicted to be infinite: this is where we get a problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K