Do Rear-Axle Chariots Have a Tighter Turning Circle Than Center-Axle Chariots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghost Writer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Turning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the turning capabilities of rear-axle versus center-axle chariots in the Near Eastern Late Bronze Age. Scholars suggest that the Egyptian two-man chariot, with its rear axle, has a tighter turning circle compared to the Hittite three-man chariot with a center axle. However, participants argue that the closer the axle is to the horse, the tighter the turning circle, contradicting the initial assertion. The scientific explanation hinges on the distribution of weight and the mechanics of horse movement in relation to the axle position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chariot design and mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Near Eastern Late Bronze Age historical context
  • Familiarity with basic physics principles related to turning radius
  • Insight into equine movement and its impact on vehicle dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of turning circles in wheeled vehicles
  • Explore historical chariot designs and their evolution
  • Study the physics of weight distribution in vehicle dynamics
  • Examine the role of horse movement in chariot maneuverability
USEFUL FOR

Historians, archaeologists, and enthusiasts of ancient technology interested in vehicle design and dynamics, as well as those studying the military applications of chariots in ancient civilizations.

Ghost Writer
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Hi all -

In the Near Eastern Late Bronze Age the Egyptians employed a two-man chariot with the axle placed at the rear of the vehicle; whereas the Hittites employed a three-man chariot with the axle placed in the center of the vehicle. As a result, the weight of the two-man crew in the Egyptian vehicle was in front of the axle whereas the weight of the three-man crew was directly over the axle. Several scholars assert that the Egyptian chariot with its rear-axle placement had a tighter turning circle than the Hittite chariot with it center-axle placement. My questions are: Is this in fact true? And if it is true, why is it true? Which is to say, what is the scientific explanation as to why a rear-axle configuration with crew weight distributed forward of the axle results in a tighter turning circle than a center-axle configuration with crew weight distributed over the axle? In asking these asking let us assume that wheel track and axle length as well as the total vehicle length (including horses) are equal for both chariots.

Thanks in advance to anyone providing answers to these questions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
A horse that steps sideways will rotate the chariot about the centre of the axle.
The closer the axle is to the horse, the tighter the possible turning circle.
That suggests the opposite of what you claim several scholars assert.
Have you got it backwards?
 
I agree with @Baluncore -- Do you have pictures or drawings of the two different designs, including the harnesses to the horse(s)?

EDIT -- Maybe like these two images?

https://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/assets/img/full-size/pharaoh-chariot-merl.jpg
pharaoh-chariot-merl.jpg


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4e/55/9f/4e559fa64a60e5ca6b1c024ddf831078.jpg
4e559fa64a60e5ca6b1c024ddf831078.jpg
 

Attachments

  • pharaoh-chariot-merl.jpg
    pharaoh-chariot-merl.jpg
    59.5 KB · Views: 581
  • 4e559fa64a60e5ca6b1c024ddf831078.jpg
    4e559fa64a60e5ca6b1c024ddf831078.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 701
Unlike a vehicle with limited front wheel steering, a horse can walk sideways, and backwards at the same time, if needed. Any chariot can therefore be turned in it's own length. If the wheels are at the rear they must be included in the length.
The length of the combination is the diagonal from one shoulder of the horse to the diagonally opposite rearmost point of the chariot or wheel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K