Does Quantum Physics Suggest the Universe Requires a Mind?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter captainnima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    mind universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the idea that quantum physics may imply the necessity of a mind for the existence of the universe. Participants explore interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly the notion that consciousness plays a role in the collapse of the wave function, and examine historical perspectives on this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the concept of a mind being necessary for the universe is linked to the "consciousness causes collapse" interpretation of quantum mechanics.
  • Others note that this interpretation is not widely accepted among physicists today, who often prefer to focus on calculations rather than interpretations.
  • A participant provides historical context, mentioning John Von Neumann's work and how he placed the observer's mind at the center of quantum mechanics, but acknowledges that this idea has largely fallen out of favor.
  • Another participant points out that the idea of a mind entering into quantum mechanics has been discussed in various books, suggesting that there are sources that explore this topic further.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the claim that a universe cannot exist without a mind, with one stating they have never encountered such a notion in serious literature.
  • References to popular culture, such as the film "What The Bleep Do We Know Anyway," are mentioned as sources that may propagate these ideas, but are not taken seriously in academic discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the validity of the claim that a mind is necessary for the universe, with multiple competing views presented. Some participants express skepticism about the idea, while others reference literature that discusses it.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals a lack of consensus on the interpretation of quantum mechanics related to consciousness, with references to historical figures and literature that may not reflect current scientific consensus.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, as well as individuals curious about the intersection of consciousness and physics.

captainnima
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So question: I heard that according to quantum physics, we cannot have a universe without mind entering into it. I am trying to figure out what this even means. Any suggestions?

zahadat nima
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are referring to an interpretation of quantum mechanics called "consciousness causes collapse". You can look that up. In modern times, few physicists worry overmuch about quantum mechanical interpretations (unless that's their job, most physicists are content to shut up and calculate when it comes to QM), and fewer physicists ascribe to the consciousness causes collapse interpretation.
 
Honestly I have never heard of this before either but thank you for the post.
 
captainnima said:
Honestly I have never heard of this before either but thank you for the post.

Just to elaborate further with a bit of historical background.

This mind stuff entering into QM dates back to a very influential book written by the great mathematician - John Von Neumann - called - Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanincs. QM is basically a theory of observations that appear here in the classical common-sense world. But exactly where one places that cut the theory is silent about - in fact Von-Neumann showed it can be placed pretty much anywhere. But if you trace it back the only place that's different is the mind of a conscious observer - so that's where he decided to place it. The idea didn't really catch on because it is rather weird, leading to all sorts of absurdities especially these days with computers and the idea of storing the outcome of an observation in computer memory and looking at it years or even centuries later. But it did catch on with one very influential mathematical physicist - Wigner. Anyway Von-Neumann died young and it left Wigner carrying the torch for this backwater idea. But during this time much more work was done on the foundations of QM - particularly in the area of decoherence. When Wigner heard of some early work of Zueck on decoherence, where it showed there indeed was a place that was different - right after decoherence - he recognised it was no longer required and did a complete 180% and abandoned it.

So that's where it stands today - the reason for its introduction is no longer required and since it leads to a very weird view of the world, in fact similar to solipsism, very few take it seriously nowadays - it really is very very backwater.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo and mfb
captainnima said:
I am trying to figure out what this even means. Any suggestions?
Generally, it is a good idea to also state where you have heard it, i.e. the source (if your remember it), because this makes it much more easy for people to address the question.

Because...

captainnima said:
So question: I heard that according to quantum physics, we cannot have a universe without mind entering into it.
(my bolding)

... I have never heard of any such thing ;). Welcome to Physics Forums, by the way!
 
DennisN said:
... I have never heard of any such thing ;).

Not in the serious literature - or even populist stuff written by those that know the facts.

However junk like 'What The Bleep Do We Know Anyway' is another matter.

Thanks
Bill
 
You can find discussions about mind entering the universe in the following books:
'Quantum Enigma' by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/quantum-enigma-9780199753819?cc=nz&lang=en&
'The Mind Matters' by David Hodgson - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-mind-matters-9780198240686?cc=nz&lang=en&
'Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?' by Franck Laloë [pgs 328 - 329 (Appendix A)] - http://www.cambridge.org/us/academi...ion/do-we-really-understand-quantum-mechanics
'Conscious Mind in the Physical World' by Euan Squires - https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750300450/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K