Does Renormalisability Depend on Spin in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Renormalisability in quantum field theory is directly influenced by the spin of particles. Quantum field theories involving spin 0 or 1/2 particles are renormalisable, while those with spin 1 are initially unrenormalisable but can achieve renormalisability through gauge theory, which introduces symmetry. Conversely, theories involving spin 2 particles, such as quantum gravity, are unrenormalisable. This relationship is discussed in detail in Section 12.1 of Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1" and Section 10.1 of Peskin and Schroeder.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory fundamentals
  • Familiarity with gauge theory concepts
  • Knowledge of particle spin classifications
  • Basic grasp of renormalisation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of gauge symmetry in quantum field theories
  • Review 't Hooft's proof related to renormalisability
  • Examine the dimensional analysis of coupling constants in quantum field theories
  • Explore the challenges of renormalising theories involving spin 2 particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, theoretical physicists researching gauge theories, and students seeking to understand the implications of particle spin on renormalisability.

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I heard that renormalisability has something to do with the spin. A quantum field theory of particles with spin 0 or 1/2 is renormalisable; where with spin 1 is originally unrenormalisable, however, since we have gauge theory for the spin 1 particles, the symmetry cures the problem, and the field theory becomes renormalisable in the case of spin = 1.
In this perspective, a field theory of spin 2 particles is unrenormalizable, like the quantum gravity.

But I haven't read about this from the renormalisation sections of some books, like Ryder or Peskin.
Is this related to the proof provided by 't Hooft?
Or anyone can provide a correct and clear picture or explanation?
Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See section 12.1 of Weinberg's "Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1".

Although it's basically just Section 10.1 of Peskin and Schroeder. There they obtain formulas for Bosons and Fermions and you can see the vertex terms, i.e. ##V## contains a term depending on the dimensionality of the coupling. It's simply that for the higher spin cases the simplest interacting terms have couplings with negative dimension.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
416
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K