Does the Gender Ratio on PF Reflect the Wider Physics Community?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kered rettop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the gender ratio on Physics Forums (PF) reflects the broader physics community, noting that interactions often seem male-dominated. It highlights that approximately 13% of last authors in physics papers are women, with female representation in university physics programs ranging from 20% to 30%. Concerns are raised about accurately determining the gender of forum users, as many women may choose to conceal their identity online. Suggestions for gathering demographic data include creating a poll, though issues of self-selection bias and anonymity are acknowledged. Overall, there is a shared curiosity about the alignment of PF demographics with those of the professional physics community.
kered rettop
Messages
259
Reaction score
95
Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried to find out whether the male/female/other ratio here is similar to that in the general physics community?
It seems to me that everyone I've engaged with on PF is male!

Food for thought?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a biologist who hangs out at PF, what is the male/female/other ration in the physics world?

In the biological world, I think the male/female ration is close to 1:1. The other fraction is unknown to me.
 
  • Informative
Likes PeroK and kered rettop
This looks like it falls into the category of "here's a big job that someone else can do for me."

Some things worth thinking about:
  • How do you know the sex of the poster? Maybe you can guess by the user name, maybe you can't.
  • Why do you think PF should match the demographics of professional physicists?
 
Constructing a poll isn't that difficult and I expect that OP would be up for that.

Speaking for myself, I am at least somewhat curious to see how much the PF demographics match that of publishing physicists.

I do have some concern about the accuracy of any data we might gather though. It is a sad fact that many many women (less so here than on less strictly moderated sites - I hope) conceal their gender online.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, mfb and BillTre
Nugatory said:
Constructing a poll isn't that difficult and I expect that OP would be up for that.

Speaking for myself, I am at least somewhat curious to see how much the PF demographics match that of publishing physicists.

I do have some concern about the accuracy of any data we might gather though. It is a sad fact that many many women (less so here than on less strictly moderated sites - I hope) conceal their gender online.
Good idea. I would have thought that the machinery of a poll would ensure anonymity. Maybe check with Greg? But how would one compensate for self-selection - perhaps men have a greater or lesser tendency to answer polls? Ooh, I know! Let's make the poll compulsory!
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top