Does the generalized gamma distribution have a mgf?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter psie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The generalized gamma distribution, defined by the density function $$f(x)=Cx^{\beta-1}e^{-x^{\alpha}}$$ for $$\beta>-1$$ and $$0<\alpha<1$$, does not possess a moment generating function (mgf) due to the divergence of the integral $$\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{tx}x^{\beta-1}e^{-x^\alpha}\, dx$$ for all $$t>0$$. While all moments exist under certain conditions, the discussion reveals that the bounds on $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$ require clarification. Specifically, the condition $$\beta/\alpha>0$$ is crucial for the existence of moments, and the restriction $$\beta>-1$$ is necessary to ensure all moments are defined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of generalized gamma distributions
  • Familiarity with moment generating functions (mgf)
  • Knowledge of gamma integrals
  • Basic concepts of probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of generalized gamma distributions in detail
  • Study the derivation and implications of moment generating functions
  • Explore the conditions for the existence of moments in probability distributions
  • Investigate the role of normalization constants in probability density functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and researchers in probability theory who are analyzing the properties of generalized gamma distributions and their moment generating functions.

psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
I'm reading An Intermediate Course in Probability by Gut. I am confused about a statement made concerning the generalized gamma distribution and its existence of a moment generating function.
I quote from An Intermediate Course in Probability by Gut:

Another class of distributions that possesses moments of all orders but not a moment generating function is the class of generalized gamma distributions whose densities are $$f(x)=Cx^{\beta-1}e^{-x^{\alpha}},\quad x>0,\tag1$$where ##\beta>-1##, ##0<\alpha<1##, and ##C## is a normalization constant (that is chosen such that the total mass equals ##1##).

It is clear that all moments exist, but, since ##\alpha<1##, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{tx}x^{\beta-1}e^{-x^\alpha}\, dx=\infty\tag2$$ for all ##t>0##, so that the moment generating function does not exist.

First, I don't think it is clear that all moments exist. Integrating ##(1)## and making the substitution ##y=x^\alpha##, and rewriting the integral in terms of a gamma integral, I get that ##C=\Gamma(\beta/\alpha)##. The only condition I get is ##\beta/\alpha>0##, so I don't see that the restriction ##\beta>-1## makes sense. I also don't see why ##\alpha<1## would make sense. Does anyone know what the proper bounds should be on ##\alpha## and ##\beta##? In view of my finding that ##\beta/\alpha>0##, I don't see why they both could be negative too.

Second, with the observations made above, does the moment generating function exist?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the correct ##C## should be ##\alpha/\Gamma(\beta/\alpha)##. And ##\beta>-1## actually makes sense if we want all moments to exist. Moreover, ##0<\alpha<1## is only specified I think to show this is when the integral diverges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K