I Does the generalized gamma distribution have a mgf?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter psie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability theory
Click For Summary
The generalized gamma distribution has moments of all orders but lacks a moment generating function (mgf) due to the condition α<1, which leads to divergence in the integral for mgf. The density function is defined as f(x)=Cx^(β-1)e^(-x^α) for x>0, with normalization constant C. There is a debate over the conditions on α and β, with one contributor suggesting that the requirement β>-1 is necessary for all moments to exist, while questioning the relevance of α<1. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the bounds for α and β, emphasizing that both could potentially be negative under certain conditions. Ultimately, the existence of the mgf remains unresolved, contingent on the correct interpretation of these parameters.
psie
Messages
315
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
I'm reading An Intermediate Course in Probability by Gut. I am confused about a statement made concerning the generalized gamma distribution and its existence of a moment generating function.
I quote from An Intermediate Course in Probability by Gut:

Another class of distributions that possesses moments of all orders but not a moment generating function is the class of generalized gamma distributions whose densities are $$f(x)=Cx^{\beta-1}e^{-x^{\alpha}},\quad x>0,\tag1$$where ##\beta>-1##, ##0<\alpha<1##, and ##C## is a normalization constant (that is chosen such that the total mass equals ##1##).

It is clear that all moments exist, but, since ##\alpha<1##, we have $$\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{tx}x^{\beta-1}e^{-x^\alpha}\, dx=\infty\tag2$$ for all ##t>0##, so that the moment generating function does not exist.

First, I don't think it is clear that all moments exist. Integrating ##(1)## and making the substitution ##y=x^\alpha##, and rewriting the integral in terms of a gamma integral, I get that ##C=\Gamma(\beta/\alpha)##. The only condition I get is ##\beta/\alpha>0##, so I don't see that the restriction ##\beta>-1## makes sense. I also don't see why ##\alpha<1## would make sense. Does anyone know what the proper bounds should be on ##\alpha## and ##\beta##? In view of my finding that ##\beta/\alpha>0##, I don't see why they both could be negative too.

Second, with the observations made above, does the moment generating function exist?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the correct ##C## should be ##\alpha/\Gamma(\beta/\alpha)##. And ##\beta>-1## actually makes sense if we want all moments to exist. Moreover, ##0<\alpha<1## is only specified I think to show this is when the integral diverges.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K