Does the paper 1408.2804v7 actually support tachyonic neutrinos?

[mrnike992]

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.2804v7.pdfDoes the data cited in this paper truly lead to the conclusion presented? Please note that I am uneducated and do not understand the details of this paper, but it seems to me that tachyons are possible provided they don't have a real rest mass. I'd like to hear what someone who knows what they're talking about has to say about this.

 

[Nugatory]

There's an ongoing discussion over in the high-energy particle physics section: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/neutrino-mass-paper.789275/

I'm closing this thread to ensure that we only have one thread going.