Does the Poisson Bracket Always Equal Zero When Both Observables Start at Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tut_einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bracket Poisson
tut_einstein
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello,

If you have two observables f and g both of which start off as: f =0 and g =0 and you evaluate their possion bracket:

{f,g}, will it necessarily be equal to zero?

Also, if just f=0 and g wasn't zero, would {f,g} =0?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think?

Are f ang g identically zero? or zero at the "start" (= initial time?) only? or zero only when some constraint is applied?
 
f and g start out being zero. so because the poisson bracket consists of derivatives of f and g, it need not necessarily be zero even if f and g started off being zero? this is what i would think.

but I'm reading a research paper that seems to suggest that if f anf g start off being zero, then the poisson bracket {f,g} is always zero.
but if only one of them started out being zero, {f,g} needn't be zero. i don't understand why this would be true.

thanks!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
991
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Back
Top