Driven mass on a circular path with coupled spring forces

  • Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Mass
4 replies · 1K views · last reply
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
Printed textbook problem 4.11, titled Driven mass on a circle: two identical masses m on a horizontal hoop joined by two identical springs of constant k, one mass driven by Fd cos ωd t. Asks for the particular solution.

Diagram of a circular ring of springs with two black masses on it, one at the top and one at the bottom; a double arrow near the top mass is labelled x1 and a label near the bottom mass reads x2.

​
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
 
Attachments
  • Diagram of a ring of linked springs drawn as a circle, with two solid masses on it at the top and bottom and a double-headed arrow above the top mass showing oscillation.
    1594764376191.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 237
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
It would help if you could post this using LaTeX (see the LaTeX Guide link at the lower left of the Edit window. Thanks.

Also, could you please explain the equations you are trying to write? It looks like you are trying to write F=ma type equations, but your terms are not clear to me (especially since some parts seem to be missing). Also, at some point fairly soon you will need to include the variables ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2## to denote the positions of the two masses as functions of time...
 
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
Some sign errors.
berkeman said:
you will need to include the variables θ1 and θ2
The x1 and x2 can be taken as angles, or arc lengths, whatever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
 
LCSphysicist said:
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
Consider the case x1=-x2, so both move the same direction around the hoop. What net forces will spring exert on them? What do your equations give?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist