Effect of time reversed hamiltonian acting on a state?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the effect of a time-reversed Hamiltonian, denoted as ##H^B(t)=H(-t)=T^{-1}H^F T##, on a quantum state ket ##|\psi>##. The participants analyze the implications of the time reversal operator ##T## and the non-commutativity of the Hamiltonians ##H^F## and ##H^B##, concluding that the assumption of equality ##H^F|\psi>=H^B|\psi>## leads to a contradiction due to the non-zero commutator condition ##[H^F,H^B]\neq 0##. The discussion highlights a common misunderstanding regarding the application of the time reversal operator and its effects on state evolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Familiarity with time reversal symmetry in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of operator algebra and commutation relations
  • Basic proficiency in differential equations and their applications in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time reversal symmetry in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of non-time-invariant Hamiltonians
  • Explore the mathematical framework of operator theory in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate examples of systems with non-commuting Hamiltonians
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in the dynamics of quantum systems and time reversal effects.

Brage
Messages
55
Reaction score
13
Hi, I have been trying to get my head around the effect of a time reversed hamiltonian ##H^B(t)=H(-t)=T^{-1}H^F T ## on a state ket ##|\psi>##, where ##H^F=H## is the regular hamiltonian for the system (energy associated with forward time translation) and ##H^B=H(-t)## is the time reversed hamiltonian, and ##T## is the time reveral operator. I here assume the hamiltionian is not time-invariant. Let me explain my through process:

As ##i\partial_t = H## this implies that ##T^{-1}i\partial_t T=T^{-1}H^F T=H^B##.

But ##T^{-1}i\partial_t T=-T^{-1}iT\partial_t=i\partial_t##, as ##T^{-1}iT = -i##. Which would seem to imply that ##H^F|\psi>=H^B|\psi>##, which seemingly contradicts the assumed condition ##[H^F,H^B]\neq 0##. I assume this means I have made a mistake somewhere but can't seem to find it.

I would appreciate any help from people who can point out my error, cheers!

Brage
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the first equality in your third paragraph arise?
 
Well ##T\partial_t |\psi>=\partial_{-t}T|\psi>## so then ##T\partial_t |\psi>=-\partial_{t}T|\psi>## correct?
 
I agree with the first equality, but I don't see how the second equality follows unless the state is linear in t.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Brage
Jilang said:
I agree with the first equality, but I don't see how the second equality follows unless the state is linear in t.
Oh of course I was using ##d(-t)=-dt##. Cheers for that!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jilang

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K