Einstein on Matter & Energy: Debunking Misconceptions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rajkovic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Quote
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quote attributed to Albert Einstein regarding the nature of matter and energy, specifically the assertion that "what we have called matter is energy." Participants express skepticism about the authenticity of the quote, noting its frequent misattribution to figures like Nikola Tesla. The conversation highlights the scientific principle that matter can exhibit wave-like behavior, particularly under conditions such as neutron diffraction, which requires extremely low temperatures. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that the quote may be a misrepresentation of Einstein's views.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave-particle duality
  • Knowledge of neutron diffraction techniques
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamics related to matter states
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore neutron diffraction experiments and their significance
  • Study the historical context of Einstein's theories on matter and energy
  • Investigate common misconceptions about quotes attributed to famous scientists
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in science, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of matter and energy in quantum mechanics.

Rajkovic
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
“Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.”
Albert Einstein

Einstein really said that? Or It's another fake quote from him in the internet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No idea, but it's not wrong to think of matter as a really compact form of energy.

Also, you do have to have special laboratory setups to see the wave-like behavior of matter. For the deBroglie wavelength to be long enough to create interference large enough to see, the matter has to be really cold (say, for neutron diffraction)
 
Considering that this only shows up in newage (rhymes with "sewage") web sites, and is attributed to Tesla almost as often as to Einstein, I think it's quite likely fake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 204 ·
7
Replies
204
Views
40K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
117K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K