Evaluation of Strike and the 3 point problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter succubus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of the 3-point problem using Cramer's Rule, particularly in relation to plotting the slope of a plane in the horizontal xy-plane. The key takeaway is the necessity of using the slope with x as a function of y when applying the arctangent function to determine the slope. The original inquiry references a specific equation from a paper provided by the user, which is essential for understanding the concept. Ultimately, the user resolved their confusion independently after a brief period of reflection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cramer's Rule
  • Familiarity with the 3-point problem in geometry
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically arctangent
  • Basic concepts of plotting equations in the xy-plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the paper referenced for Equation 26 to deepen understanding of the 3-point problem
  • Study advanced applications of Cramer's Rule in various mathematical contexts
  • Explore the relationship between slopes and functions in coordinate geometry
  • Practice plotting equations in the xy-plane to solidify understanding of slope calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying geometry and linear algebra, as well as professionals dealing with spatial analysis and modeling.

succubus
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Evaluation of Strike and the 3 point problem...

If anyone in ehre is familiar with the 3-point problem and Cramers Rule, I need some help.

In the evaluation of strike, you are supposed to take the equation for the plane in the horizontal xy plane. But when you arctan the slope, you are supposed to use the slope with x plotted as a functin of y. I don't quite understand this concept. If you need a better explanation you can read about it in this paper written by my teacher.

http://www.nagt.org/files/nagt/jge/c...-v48n4p522.pdf

Its equation 26.

Any help would be appreciated.

-Pati
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Nevermind, after thinking about it for about 10 minutes I got it :( ROFL 1 year later MUHAHAHAHAHA :o
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K