jeremy22511
- 29
- 0
- TL;DR
- If E(X1)>E(X2), does it mean that E(1/X1)<E(1/X2)? Thanks!
If E(X1)>E(X2), does it mean that E(1/X1)<E(1/X2)? Thanks!
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the expected value of a variable and the expected value of its reciprocal, specifically questioning whether a higher expected value of one variable implies a lower expected value of its reciprocal compared to another variable. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.
Participants do not reach a consensus. There are multiple competing views on the implications of expected values and their reciprocals, with some arguing against a direct relationship and others exploring specific cases that challenge or support the initial question.
Participants note the importance of considering the nature of the random variables involved, particularly whether they can take on zero or negative values, which significantly affects the expected values of their reciprocals.
mathman said:No: Example two values X1=0 or 10. X2=1 or 3 (equal prob. for both).
E(X1)=5 and E(X2)=2. E(1/X1) is infinite, E(1/X2)=2/3.
Why don't you try some simple examples to see what happens? There seem to a lot of students who are unfamiliar with the concept of looking for a simple counterexample.jeremy22511 said:Summary:: If E(X1)>E(X2), does it mean that E(1/X1)<E(1/X2)? Thanks!
If E(X1)>E(X2), does it mean that E(1/X1)<E(1/X2)? Thanks!
##1/X_1## makes absolutely no sense.mathman said:No: Example two values X1=0 or 10. X2=1 or 3 (equal prob. for both).
E(X1)=5 and E(X2)=2. E(1/X1) is infinite, E(1/X2)=2/3.
Try fixing Y as 1 and letting X take two values, equally likely, with a mean slightly greater than 1.jeremy22511 said:What about the case with positive random variables?
If that's in reply to post #8, I was not suggesting 1/E(X)=E(1/X). The idea is to find a pair of values for X such that E(X)>1 =E(Y) and E(1/X)>1=E(1/Y).PeroK said:In general, if ##X## takes two values ##a, b## with equal probability, then ##E(\frac 1 X) = \frac 1 {E(X)}## only when ##a = b##:
$$E(\frac 1 X) = \frac 1 2 (\frac 1 a + \frac 1 b) = \frac 1 {ab}(\frac{a + b}{2}) = \frac 1 {ab} E(X)$$
$$E(\frac 1 X) = \frac 1 {E(X)} \ \Rightarrow \ E(X)^2 = ab \ \Rightarrow \ (a+b)^2 = 4ab \ \Rightarrow \ (a-b)^2 = 0$$
It was just a general post to show that one doesn't have to be clever to find an example. The result the OP was looking for can only be true in a special case.haruspex said:If that's in reply to post #8, I was not suggesting 1/E(X)=E(1/X). The idea is to find a pair of values for X such that E(X)>1 =E(Y) and E(1/X)>1=E(1/Y).
@BWV seems to have come up with a closely related example.
Hmm... ok, but I don't see how your post shows that. How does it give an example of E(X)>E(Y) while E(1/X)>E(1/Y)?PeroK said:It was just a general post to show that one doesn't have to be clever to find an example. The result the OP was looking for can only be true in a special case.
I forgot that bit!haruspex said:Hmm... ok, but I don't see how your post shows that. How does it give an example of E(X)>E(Y) while E(1/X)>E(1/Y)?
Not really hard. Let X== 1 and Y be uniform on [-2,-1].BWV said:More challenging to find an example where E(X)>E(Y) and E(1/X) >E(1/Y)
where Var(X) < Var(Y).
I think it was sort of agreed earlier in the thread that X and Y should be taken as always nonnegative.FactChecker said:Not really hard. Let X== 1 and Y be uniform on [-2,-1].
In that case, I suspect it is impossible. I am not sure how to prove it.haruspex said:I think it was sort of agreed earlier in the thread that X and Y should be taken as always nonnegative.