What are Amalgamated Products in Group Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Amalgamated products in group theory refer to the construction of a new group from two groups H and K, along with a third group G that maps into both. This construction, denoted as H x_G K, is the pushout in the category of groups and is unique up to isomorphism, provided the groups have a set of generators. It is particularly useful in topology, exemplified by the Seifert-Van Kampen theorem, which helps compute fundamental groups. For instance, when calculating the fundamental group of a torus, the amalgamated product identifies certain loops, leading to an abelianized structure of Z x Z. This concept is significant for understanding the relationships between different groups and their topological implications.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i found in this paper the term in the title:
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/9305201
what can you tell me about them?
i didnt find anything about them in mathworld.com

the only thing i know from the paper is that it concerns group theory.
(is this the right forum for this kind of question? if not move it as you please).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let H and K be two groups with maps from a third group G to each, then the amalgamated product over G (with these maps) often denoted H x_G K is the pushout of the diagram in Grp, or if you don't like category theory it is an object (group) with maps from H and K such that the composites with the injections from G agree, and it is universal with this property.

this exists and is unique up to unique isomorphism, as long as your groups have a set of generators.

examples of this abound in topology where it is used to find the homotopy groups using the Seifert-Van Kampen theorem. (some people don't use the Seifert part of the name)

example compute the fundamental group of the torus:

we cover with two open patches one is just the torus less a point (this is homotopic to the bouquet of two circles), the other a small open disc about this point. the over lap is then homotopic to a circle, thus we get

G= Z, H=triv, K=Free prod on two gens=F_2, the fundamental groups of those subset.

the single cycle in G is sent to the loop xyx^{-1}y^{-1}, and the id in triv, so these must be identified in the amalgamated porduct, and that is the only rule we see the generators must satisify, so that just tells us to abelianize F_2, ie ZxZ.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
827
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
861
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K