Expressing with "product" notation

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Product
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the factorial of a number \( j \) using product notation, specifically the use of the \( \prod \) symbol. Participants explore the relationship between factorials and product notation, clarifying how to represent \( j! \) in this format.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially suggests that expressing \( j! \) in product notation might involve a sum of factorials, which is not the intended approach.
  • Another participant clarifies that \( j! \) can be expressed as the product of integers from 1 to \( j \), prompting a discussion on how to rewrite this using \( \prod \) notation.
  • A participant unfamiliar with product notation seeks guidance on its usage, leading to further explanations about the notation's structure.
  • Participants discuss the function \( f(k) \) that relates to the index \( k \) in the product notation, with one suggesting that \( f(k) = k \) is appropriate for expressing \( j! \).
  • Another participant points out that due to the commutativity of multiplication, \( j! \) can also be expressed as \( \prod_{k=0}^{j-1}(j-k) \), indicating an alternative representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correct form of expressing \( j! \) using product notation, but there are variations in how to represent it, indicating some level of exploration and refinement of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific limits and definitions of the product notation, as well as the implications of using different functions \( f(k) \) in the context of factorials.

shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
1]express j! in ∏ notation

Are they just wanting something like $$j! + (j-1)! + (j-2)! +(j-3)!$$...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, they want you to take:

$$j!=1\cdot2\cdot3\cdots(j-2)(j-1)j$$

And rewrite the right side using $$\prod$$ notation. Are you familiar with how to use this notation?
 
No I'm not familiar.

- - - Updated - - -

$$\prod^n_{i=1} j!$$ something like this?
 
It works like this:

$$\prod_{k=1}^n\left[f(k)\right]\equiv f(1)\cdot f(2)\cdot f(3)\cdots f(n-2)\cdot f(n-1)\cdot f(n)$$

So, what do you suppose the relationship between $f$ and the index $k$ would be? What do you suppose should be the lower and upper limit for the index $k$?
 
f is always multiplied by k.

$$\prod^j_{k=1} n!$$
 
shamieh said:
f is always multiplied by k.

$$\prod^j_{k=1} n!$$

You have the limits correct, but what you have written is:

$$\prod^j_{k=1} n!=(n!)^j$$

Compare the two expressions I gave:

$$j!=1\cdot2\cdot3\cdots(j-2)(j-1)j$$

$$\prod_{k=1}^n\left[f(k)\right]\equiv f(1)\cdot f(2)\cdot f(3)\cdots f(n-2)\cdot f(n-1)\cdot f(n)$$

Do you see that in this case we want:

$$f(k)=k$$

Hence:

$$\prod_{k=1}^j\left[k\right]=j!$$
 
OH I see what you're saying..
 
Because of the commutativity of multiplication, you could also write:

$$j!=\prod_{k=0}^{j-1}\left[j-k\right]$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
683
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K