Extracting zero-point energy using the Casimir effect?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of extracting energy from the zero-point field using the Casimir effect, particularly through the movement of conducting plates. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical challenges, and the nature of energy conservation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy could be extracted from the zero-point field via the Casimir effect by allowing two conducting plates to move together and perform work.
  • Others argue that this concept resembles a perpetuum mobile, suggesting that it may not be feasible due to energy conservation laws.
  • One participant mentions that several researchers, including Sakharov and Puthoff, have theorized about energy extraction from the zero-point field, but practical applications remain unproven.
  • Another participant asserts that energy cannot be extracted using the Casimir effect, citing the conservation of energy and questioning the credibility of certain researchers involved in this field.
  • One participant describes a hypothetical cycle for a Casimir energy machine, detailing steps for utilizing the Casimir force, while others challenge the feasibility of this cycle based on energy requirements.
  • Another viewpoint compares the Casimir effect to extracting energy from a waterfall, suggesting a potential analogy for understanding energy extraction processes.
  • Concerns are raised about the energy needed to reset the system after work is done, emphasizing that the energy required to separate the plates would equal the energy gained.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of energy extraction from the zero-point field using the Casimir effect. While some explore theoretical possibilities, others firmly reject the idea based on conservation principles, indicating a lack of consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the theoretical nature of the discussion, with no practical demonstrations of energy extraction from the zero-point field. The conversation also reflects varying interpretations of energy conservation in relation to the Casimir effect.

johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
Hi,

People have hypothesized that one could extract energy from the zero-point field using the Casimir effect by letting the two conducting plates move together and do some useful work.

But surely to reset the system one needs to supply the same amount of work to separate the plates again so no net work is done by such a system?

Is that correct?

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had subscribed to this thread, hoping that someone with some useful contribution would respond. But since I am somewhat curious myself, let me try to get this discussion started...
Your argument makes sense. This sounds a bit like a perpetuum mobile (which would make this impossible a priori), but I'm not sure it technically is one... after all, AFAIK it is a commonly accepted theory that virtual particles can become "real", for example if they are created near a black hole and one is sucked in.

So can you get a little more specific who "people" are and how they visualise this extraction of energy?
 
CompuChip said:
So can you get a little more specific who "people" are and how they visualise this extraction of energy?
Sakharov, Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff all have thought that energy might be extracted from the zero-point field. The latter three had some research financed by NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion program. Sakharov urged his government to ban zero-point experimentation, thinking it was too dangerous (the destroy-the-universe kind of dangerous). So far, no practical extraction of energy, only theoretical "what-ifs".
 
No, energy can't be extracted using the Casimir effect. Puthoff & Co are infamous crackpots. (From what i understand, Puthoff hasn't done a single serious thing in physics since he got his PhD. But he's done quite a lot of non-serious stuff, such as vouching for Scientology and Uri Geller)

Neither QED in general, or the Casimir effect in particular, or virtual particles allow for the violation of conservation of energy (despite some popular-scientific descriptions to that effect). That's really all there is to it as far as I'm concerned.
 
johne1618 said:
Hi,

People have hypothesized that one could extract energy from the zero-point field using the Casimir effect by letting the two conducting plates move together and do some useful work.

But surely to reset the system one needs to supply the same amount of work to separate the plates again so no net work is done by such a system?

Is that correct?

John

Hi John;
Some years ago Robert Forward sent me some stuff he was working on at Hughes Labs for the Air Force.
I found this one to be interesting with regards to your Casimir energy question:
http://www.calphysics.org/articles/Forward1984.pdf

Creator

Also I found your thread on Zitterbewegung and spin to be astute enough to warrant a reply but haven't found the time to give it the attention it deserves.
Maybe I can get to it later.
 
Hi,

Thanks for link to Robert Forward's paper.

How about this for a Casimir energy machine cycle?

1/ Start with two conducting plates placed opposite each other at separation d.
2/ Let the Casimir force pull the plates together and use the resulting energy to do some useful work.
3/ Now slide the plates apart - hopefully this shouldn't require much energy.
4/ Separate the plates by distance d again. This shouldn't take much energy as long as they are *not* opposite each other while you separate them.
5/ Now slide them so that they are back opposite each other at separation d.
6/ Repeat

John
 
johne1618 said:
3/ Now slide the plates apart - hopefully this shouldn't require much energy.
4/ Separate the plates by distance d again. This shouldn't take much energy as long as they are *not* opposite each other while you separate them.

It takes at least as much energy as you got in work. It's a conservative force.
You might as well suggest the same only using gravity, or London forces. (Incidentally, London forces are related to the Casimir effect.)
 
I once saw an article which basically relayed calculations which suggesged plates the size of a city could generate useful power.

If I recall correctly, it was exploiting the fact that the plates are not pulled together uniformly by the Casimir vacuum thus there would be miniscule waves in each plate, the energy of which could be extracted.
 
I don't know whether the Casimir Force is conservative of not.

Maybe the situation is analogous to that of extracting energy from a water fall.

1/ We slide a plate into the flowing water.
2/ The pressure of the water pushes the plate down and does useful work.
3/ We slide the plate out of the stream of water.
4/ We move the plate up to its original position.
5/ Repeat

Number 2/ is like the Casimir force in that it is induced by a pressure difference.
 
  • #10
Except that the maximum amount of work done, is mgh, where m is the mass of the plate and h is the difference in height. And once the plate has been slid out from under the water fall, you will need at least that same amount of energy to push it back up. The trick being, of course, that gravity is definitely conservative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K