Hello! So I understand that in QFT and based on the second quantization, one introduce the hermitian operator ##\hat{\phi}(x)##. So, if we have a state with n particles ##|n>## we can get the configuration space representation as: ##\psi(x_1,..,x_n,t)=<0|\hat{\phi}(x_1)...\hat{\phi}(x_n)|n>## (please let me know if anything I said is wrong). Then I read that writing the action for a field, in the end we can derive ##H[\pi,\phi]##, with ##\pi## the conjugate momentum of ##\psi## and here is where I get confused. What is the meaning of ##\phi## without a hat? It means it is just a scalar field, not a field operator? So it is just as ##\phi## was previously, in the first quantization QM? And if in the end we go back to a scalar field and not an operator, what is the point of the second quantization? I.e., if we solve the Klein-Gordon equation for ##\phi(x)## we still get a plane wave, so where is the operator-like behavior of ##\phi##? And I see that both ##\phi## and ##\psi## appear in this formalism, so they can't represent both the same thing. Thank you!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Field operator

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Field operator | Date |
---|---|

A Confusion regarding the $\partial_{\mu}$ operator | Jul 24, 2017 |

A Primaries, descendents and transformation properties in CFT | Feb 27, 2017 |

I Ladder operators in electron field and electron's charge | Jan 8, 2017 |

A Field operator eigenstates & Fock states(Hatfield's Sch rep) | Dec 30, 2016 |

A Problem with fields and operators in holographic duality | Aug 22, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**