Finally a physics paper with a little originality

In summary, the paper arXiv:1210.8144 discusses the possibility of localized bubbles of spacetime curvature and how they could explain the enigmatic descriptions of an extraordinary island by Gustaf Johansen in the late Francis Wayland Thurston's manuscript. The paper proposes a simplified example of such a geometry and shows that Johansen's descriptions were not simply the ravings of a lunatic, but rather the nontechnical observations of an intelligent man who did not understand how to describe what he was seeing. The paper also calculates the type of matter that would be required to generate such exotic spacetime curvature and concludes that it is unphysical and beyond the realm of human science. The paper also mentions the cult of Cthul
  • #1
Jim Kata
197
6
arXiv:1210.8144 (cross-list from physics.pop-ph) [pdf, ps, other]
Possible Bubbles of Spacetime Curvature in the South Pacific
Benjamin K. Tippett
Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures. Before you charter a boat, please look up the collected works of HP Lovecraft
Subjects: Popular Physics (physics.pop-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
In 1928, the late Francis Wayland Thurston published a scandalous manuscript in purport of warning the world of a global conspiracy of occultists. Among the documents he gathered to support his thesis was the personal account of a sailor by the name of Gustaf Johansen, describing an encounter with an extraordinary island. Johansen`s descriptions of his adventures upon the island are fantastic, and are often considered the most enigmatic (and therefore the highlight) of Thurston`s collection of documents.
We contend that all of the credible phenomena which Johansen described may be explained as being the observable consequences of a localized bubble of spacetime curvature. Many of his most incomprehensible statements (involving the geometry of the architecture, and variability of the location of the horizon) can therefore be said to have a unified underlying cause.
We propose a simplified example of such a geometry, and show using numerical computation that Johansen`s descriptions were, for the most part, not simply the ravings of a lunatic. Rather, they are the nontechnical observations of an intelligent man who did not understand how to describe what he was seeing. Conversely, it seems to us improbable that Johansen should have unwittingly given such a precise description of the consequences of spacetime curvature, if the details of this story were merely the dregs of some half remembered fever dream.
We calculate the type of matter which would be required to generate such exotic spacetime curvature. Unfortunately, we determine that the required matter is quite unphysical, and possesses a nature which is entirely alien to all of the experiences of human science. Indeed, any civilization with mastery over such matter would be able to construct warp drives, cloaking devices, and other exotic geometries

Gravitational lensing and the cult of Cthulhu

See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=648429
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jim Kata said:
arXiv:1210.8144 (cross-list from physics.pop-ph) [pdf, ps, other]
Possible Bubbles of Spacetime Curvature in the South Pacific
Benjamin K. Tippett
Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures. Before you charter a boat, please look up the collected works of HP Lovecraft
Subjects: Popular Physics (physics.pop-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
In 1928, the late Francis Wayland Thurston published a scandalous manuscript in purport of warning the world of a global conspiracy of occultists. Among the documents he gathered to support his thesis was the personal account of a sailor by the name of Gustaf Johansen, describing an encounter with an extraordinary island. Johansen`s descriptions of his adventures upon the island are fantastic, and are often considered the most enigmatic (and therefore the highlight) of Thurston`s collection of documents.
We contend that all of the credible phenomena which Johansen described may be explained as being the observable consequences of a localized bubble of spacetime curvature. Many of his most incomprehensible statements (involving the geometry of the architecture, and variability of the location of the horizon) can therefore be said to have a unified underlying cause.
We propose a simplified example of such a geometry, and show using numerical computation that Johansen`s descriptions were, for the most part, not simply the ravings of a lunatic. Rather, they are the nontechnical observations of an intelligent man who did not understand how to describe what he was seeing. Conversely, it seems to us improbable that Johansen should have unwittingly given such a precise description of the consequences of spacetime curvature, if the details of this story were merely the dregs of some half remembered fever dream.
We calculate the type of matter which would be required to generate such exotic spacetime curvature. Unfortunately, we determine that the required matter is quite unphysical, and possesses a nature which is entirely alien to all of the experiences of human science. Indeed, any civilization with mastery over such matter would be able to construct warp drives, cloaking devices, and other exotic geometries

Gravitational lensing and the cult of Cthulhu

See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=648429

Maybe a little too much originality. This is all fictitious.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
ImaLooser said:
Maybe a little too much originality. This is all fictitious.
Isn't that the point? This is a Halloween joke based on a Lovecraft story.
 

1. What is the main focus of "Finally a physics paper with a little originality"?

The main focus of this physics paper is to introduce a new and unique perspective on a previously studied topic.

2. What makes this physics paper different from others?

This physics paper offers original ideas and concepts that have not been explored before, providing a fresh approach to the subject matter.

3. How does this physics paper contribute to the field of physics?

This paper adds to the existing body of knowledge in physics by presenting new theories and hypotheses for further research and experimentation.

4. Who is the target audience for this physics paper?

The target audience for this paper would primarily be other physicists and scientists who are interested in expanding their understanding of the topic.

5. What are some potential implications of the findings in this physics paper?

The findings in this paper could potentially lead to groundbreaking discoveries and advancements in the field of physics, as well as open up new areas of research and study.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
20
Views
4K
Back
Top