MHB Find Difference in Total Cost for Engagement Ring at 2 Jewelers

AI Thread Summary
A prospective bridegroom compares engagement rings from two jewelers, each priced at $2400. The first jeweler requires a 20% down payment and charges 11% simple interest on the remaining balance, resulting in a total cost of $2611.20. The second jeweler requires a 25% down payment and charges 12% simple interest, leading to a total cost of $2616. The difference in total cost between the two jewelers is $4.80. Additionally, a customer inquires about the original amount of a bill that, with a 1.5% late fee, totals $332.92, and the correct original amount is calculated to be approximately $328.
bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
1. A prospective bridegroom wants to buy an engagement
ring. Two jewelry stores each show him a ring at a cost
of \$2400. One jeweler requires a 20% down payment
with the balance to be paid at the end of one year at 11%
simple interest. The other jeweler requires a 25% down
payment with the balance to be paid at the end of one
year at 12% simple interest. What is the difference in
total cost?

my solution,

for the first jeweler

$.20(2400)=480$ \$480 down payment

$2400-480=1920$ \$1920 balance to be paid(with 11% interest)

then the total cost is,

$1920(.11)+1920+480=2611.2$

\$ 2611.2 total cost of the ring at the first jewelry store.

for the 2nd jewelry store,

$.25(2400)=600$ \$600 down payment

$2400-600=1800$ \$1800 balance to be paid(with 12% interest)

then the total cost is,

$1800(.12)+1800+600=2616$

\$ 2616 total cost of the ring at the 2nd jewelry store.

so, $2616-2611.2=4.8$ \$4.8 is the difference in the total cost.

did i get it correctly?

2. Because payment is one month overdue, a customer
receives a department store bill for \$332.92 that includes
a 1.5% interest charge for late payment. What was the
original amount of the bill?

my solution

$332.92-332.92(0.015)=327.9262$

\$327.9262 original price.

is this also right?

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
bergausstein said:
1. A prospective bridegroom wants to buy an engagement
ring. Two jewelry stores each show him a ring at a cost
of \$2400. One jeweler requires a 20% down payment
with the balance to be paid at the end of one year at 11%
simple interest. The other jeweler requires a 25% down
payment with the balance to be paid at the end of one
year at 12% simple interest. What is the difference in
total cost?

my solution,

for the first jeweler

$.20(2400)=480$ \$480 down payment

$2400-480=1920$ \$1920 balance to be paid(with 11% interest)

then the total cost is,

$1920(.11)+1920+480=2611.2$

\$ 2611.2 total cost of the ring at the first jewelry store.

for the 2nd jewelry store,

$.25(2400)=600$ \$600 down payment

$2400-600=1800$ \$1800 balance to be paid(with 12% interest)

then the total cost is,

$1800(.12)+1800+600=2616$

\$ 2616 total cost of the ring at the 2nd jewelry store.

so, $2616-2611.2=4.8$ \$4.8 is the difference in the total cost.

did i get it correctly?

Hello.

Yes.

bergausstein said:
2. Because payment is one month overdue, a customer
receives a department store bill for \$332.92 that includes
a 1.5% interest charge for late payment. What was the
original amount of the bill?

my solution

$332.92-332.92(0.015)=327.9262$

\$327.9262 original price.

is this also right?

thanks!

Not.

Supposing that 1,50 % is the total interest for the month of delay:

P=original price

P+\dfrac{1.5}{100} P=1.015 \ P=332.92

P=\dfrac{332.92}{1.015}=328Checking:

328+328 \dfrac{1.5}{100}=328+4.92=332.92

Regards.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top