Find the smallest integer ## a>2 ## such that ## 2\mid a ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the smallest integer \( a > 2 \) that satisfies a set of divisibility conditions: \( 2 \mid a \), \( 3 \mid (a+1) \), \( 4 \mid (a+2) \), \( 5 \mid (a+3) \), and \( 6 \mid (a+4) \). The problem is situated within the context of number theory and modular arithmetic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the divisibility conditions, particularly how certain conditions may be redundant. There is a discussion on whether the condition \( a \equiv 0 \pmod{2} \) is necessary given that \( 4 \mid (a+2) \) implies it. Others question the reasoning behind this assertion and seek clarification on the derivation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in reasoning about the conditions and their implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the potential redundancy of certain conditions, and there is an ongoing inquiry into the logical connections between them.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the assumptions underlying the problem, particularly the necessity of each divisibility condition. There is a focus on the implications of the conditions rather than a straightforward solution.

Math100
Messages
823
Reaction score
234
Homework Statement
Find the smallest integer ## a>2 ## such that ## 2\mid a, 3\mid (a+1), 4\mid (a+2), 5\mid (a+3), 6\mid (a+4) ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Let ## a>2 ## be the smallest integer.
Then
\begin{align*}
&2\mid a\implies a\equiv 0\pmod {2}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {2}\\
&3\mid (a+1)\implies a+1\equiv 0\pmod {3}\implies a\equiv -1\pmod {3}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {3}\\
&4\mid (a+2)\implies a+2\equiv 0\pmod {4}\implies a\equiv -2\pmod {4}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {4}\\
&5\mid (a+3)\implies a+3\equiv 0\pmod {5}\implies a\equiv -3\pmod {5}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {5}\\
&6\mid (a+4)\implies a+4\equiv 0\pmod {6}\implies a\equiv -4\pmod {6}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {6}.\\
\end{align*}
Observe that ## lcm(2, 3, 4, 5, 6)=60 ##.
Thus ## a\equiv 2\pmod {60}\implies a=62 ##.
Therefore, the smallest integer ## a>2 ## such that ## 2\mid a, 3\mid (a+1), 4\mid (a+2), 5\mid (a+3), 6\mid (a+4) ## is ## 62 ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Find the smallest integer ## a>2 ## such that ## 2\mid a, 3\mid (a+1), 4\mid (a+2), 5\mid (a+3), 6\mid (a+4) ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Let ## a>2 ## be the smallest integer.
Then
\begin{align*}
&2\mid a\implies a\equiv 0\pmod {2}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {2}\\
&3\mid (a+1)\implies a+1\equiv 0\pmod {3}\implies a\equiv -1\pmod {3}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {3}\\
&4\mid (a+2)\implies a+2\equiv 0\pmod {4}\implies a\equiv -2\pmod {4}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {4}\\
&5\mid (a+3)\implies a+3\equiv 0\pmod {5}\implies a\equiv -3\pmod {5}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {5}\\
&6\mid (a+4)\implies a+4\equiv 0\pmod {6}\implies a\equiv -4\pmod {6}\implies a\equiv 2\pmod {6}.\\
\end{align*}
Observe that ## lcm(2, 3, 4, 5, 6)=60 ##.
Thus ## a\equiv 2\pmod {60}\implies a=62 ##.
Therefore, the smallest integer ## a>2 ## such that ## 2\mid a, 3\mid (a+1), 4\mid (a+2), 5\mid (a+3), 6\mid (a+4) ## is ## 62 ##.
Nice. And correct.

You could drop the first condition ##a\equiv 0\pmod 2## since it follows automatically from ##4\,|\,(a+2).## Same for ##a\equiv 2\pmod 3.## We only need ##4,5,6.##

(##6\,|\,(a+4)\Longrightarrow 3\,|\,(a+3+1)\Longrightarrow 3\,|\,(a+1)##)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
You could drop the first condition ##a\equiv 0\pmod 2## since it follows automatically from ##4\,|\,(a+2).## Same for ##a\equiv 2\pmod 3.## We only need ##4,5,6.##

I'm sorry but what do you mean by it follows automatically from 4 | a=(a+2) for the first condition? Could you show how you derived that?
 
Nanitf said:
I'm sorry but what do you mean by it follows automatically from 4 | a=(a+2) for the first condition? Could you show how you derived that?
Assume ##a\not\equiv 0 \pmod{2}## then ##a=2k+1## for some ##k\in \mathbb{Z}## and ##a+2=2k+3## is odd, and thus cannot be divided by ##4.## Or positively:
\begin{align*}
4\,|\,(a+2) \Longrightarrow 2\,|\,(a+2) \Longrightarrow 2\,|\,a \Longrightarrow a\equiv 0\pmod{2}
\end{align*}
where the only interesting step is ##2\,|\,(a+2) \Rightarrow a+2=2\cdot b\Rightarrow a=2\cdot b-2=2\cdot(b-1) \Rightarrow 2\,|\,a.##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K