Finding Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, [3]

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors for a given system of differential equations represented by a $3 \times 3$ matrix. Participants explore the calculation of eigenvalues, the determination of corresponding eigenvectors for specific eigenvalues, and the formulation of a general solution based on these eigenvectors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially claims eigenvalues of $\lambda_1 = -3$, $\lambda_2 = 1$, and $\lambda_3 = 2$, but others challenge this, suggesting $\lambda_1 = 1$, $\lambda_2 = 2$, and $\lambda_3 = 3$ instead.
  • There is a discussion about the characteristic polynomial, with one participant asserting it should be second-degree, while others argue it should be third-degree due to the matrix size.
  • Participants propose various eigenvectors for the smallest, middle, and largest eigenvalues, including vectors like $\begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix}$ and $\begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ -3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}$, but these are met with skepticism and corrections from others.
  • One participant suggests that a suitable eigenvector for the smallest eigenvalue is $\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}$, while another questions this based on the equations derived from the matrix.
  • There is confusion regarding the existence of certain eigenvectors, particularly when discussing the implications of setting variables to zero in the context of eigenvalue equations.
  • Participants also discuss the general solution of the system, with one proposing a solution based on their eigenvectors, which is later confirmed as correct by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as multiple competing views and corrections are presented throughout the discussion. Participants express uncertainty and challenge each other's claims without reaching a definitive agreement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the calculations and the implications of certain eigenvector choices, indicating potential misunderstandings of the underlying mathematics. The discussion reflects a variety of approaches and interpretations regarding the eigenvalue problem.

shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Consider the system:

$x' = x + y + z$
$y' = 0x + 2y + 3z$
$z' = 0x + 0y + 3z$

a)Find the eigenvalues for the systemSo after doing my $3 \times 3$ matrix I got: $\lambda_1 = -3$, $\lambda_2 = 1$, and $\lambda_3 = 2$ , is this correct?

b)Find an eigenvector for the smallest eigenvalue

So I am getting the eqn(s): $-4v_1 - 6v_2 - 10v_3 = 0$ but I'm stuck on how to solve now.. I am thinking the only way would be to do $v_1 = v_2 =1$ and $v_3 = -1$ so then wouldn't i have $(^1_{1_{-1}})$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi shamieh,

Your $\lambda_1$ should be $3$ instead of $-3$.
 
How? I got det$(A) = 3\lambda^2 - 9\lambda + 6$
 
The matrix is 3 x 3, so how can your characteristic polynomial be second-degree? The characteristic polynomial should be $(\lambda -1)(\lambda -2)(\lambda -3) $.
 
Euge, you are correct. I was doing the 3x3 matrix but forgetting to put my - $\lambda$ within the corresponding columns. I ended up with $\lambda_1 = 1$ , $\lambda_2 = 3$, $\lambda_3 = 2$ Does this seem correct?
 
for part b) Find an eigenvector for the smallest eigenvalue I got this for my eigenvector \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix} , is this correct? or should it just be \begin{bmatrix} 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix} ? Thanks again in advance for your alls help you are seriously awesome
 
Also for part c) find an eigenvector for the middle eigenvalue I got \begin{bmatrix} 6 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}
 
And also for part d) find an eigenvector for the largest eigenvalue I got \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ -3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} then for part e) write the general solution i got:

$X(t) = C_1 \begin{bmatrix} 0\\ 4 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}e^{t} + C_2 \begin{bmatrix} 6 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} e^{3t} + C_3 \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ -3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} e^{3t}$

Can anyone verify these solutions. Sorry for the triple post, and thanks again.
 
shamieh said:
Euge, you are correct. I was doing the 3x3 matrix but forgetting to put my - $\lambda$ within the corresponding columns. I ended up with $\lambda_1 = 1$ , $\lambda_2 = 3$, $\lambda_3 = 2$ Does this seem correct?
Yes, it does -- the eigenvalues are indeed $1,2,3$.

shamieh said:
for part b) Find an eigenvector for the smallest eigenvalue I got this for my eigenvector \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix} , is this correct? or should it just be \begin{bmatrix} 4 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix} ? Thanks again in advance for your alls help you are seriously awesome
Since the matrix is $3 \times 3$, conceptually it does not make sense for an eigenvector of this matrix to be $2\times 1$. So you can eliminate the latter option. The former option is incorrect. If say, your matrix is $A$, then any eigenvector $x$ corresponding to the smallest eigenvalue must satisfy $Ax = x$; you can check that your vector does not satisfy this. A suitable eigenvector is $\begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$.

shamieh said:
Also for part c) find an eigenvector for the middle eigenvalue I got \begin{bmatrix} 6 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}
Incorrect. A suitable choice for an eigenvector is $\begin{bmatrix}1\\1\\0\end{bmatrix}$.
shamieh said:
And also for part d) find an eigenvector for the largest eigenvalue I got \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ -3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} then for part e) write the general solution i got:

$X(t) = C_1 \begin{bmatrix} 0\\ 4 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}e^{t} + C_2 \begin{bmatrix} 6 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} e^{3t} + C_3 \begin{bmatrix} -1 \\ -3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} e^{3t}$
None of your eigenvectors are correct, so your final answer is incorrect. For the last eigenvector, $\begin{bmatrix}2\\3\\1\end{bmatrix}$ is a suitable choice.
 
  • #10
For the smallest eigenvector how are you getting \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} when you have \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 \end{bmatrix} which turns to three equations...:

$(0) * v_1 -v_2 -v_3 = 0$
$(0) * v_1 - v_2 -3v_3 = 0$
$(0) * v_1 + (0) * v_2 -2v_3 = 0$
 
  • #11
So how are you plugging in a $1$ for $v_1$ when $v_1$ doesn't exist... We multiplied it by $0$...
 
  • #12
shamieh said:
For the smallest eigenvector how are you getting \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} when you have \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & -3 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 \end{bmatrix} which turns to three equations...:

$(0) * v_1 -v_2 -v_3 = 0$
$(0) * v_1 - v_2 -3v_3 = 0$
$(0) * v_1 + (0) * v_2 -2v_3 = 0$

What do you mean by the "smallest eigenvector"? The vector $\begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$ is an eigenvector associated with the smallest eigenvalue $1$. You can see this from your own equations. Your third equation gives $v_3 = 0$. Plugging this back into the first equation, we get $v_2 = 0$. The variable $v_3$ is free to roam. Setting $v_3 = 1$, we obtain $\begin{bmatrix}v_1\\v_2\\v_3\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$.

shamieh said:
So how are you plugging in a $1$ for $v_1$ when $v_1$ doesn't exist... We multiplied it by $0$...

I do not understand the question.
 
  • #13
Nevermind , I get it now. So for part d) Find an eigenvector for the largest eigenvalue would this \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} also be correct for the largest eigenvalue vector? because 2 -1 - 1 = 0?
 
  • #14
shamieh said:
Nevermind , I get it now. So for part d) Find an eigenvector for the largest eigenvalue would this \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} also be correct for the largest eigenvalue vector? because 2 -1 - 1 = 0?

How did you get this vector? And what does it have to do with $2 - 1 - 1 = 0$? Please explain.
 
  • #15
Ignore my comment, Lol. I understand now. I was thinking way too hard. I am giong to post what I think the general solution is in a second.
 
  • #16
so the general solution is: $X(t) = C_1 \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}e^{t} + C_2 \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} e^{2t} + C_3 \begin{bmatrix} 2 \\ 3 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} e^{3t}$
 
  • #17
Yes, this is correct. :D
 
  • #18
Sorry to be a nuisance Euge, it took me a good 10 minutes to realize that I was solving for what I had and then needed to recursively solve the larger equation. It also took me a moment to notice that you can not have a eigenvector that doesn't contain at least one non-zero. Thanks so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K