Undergrad Finding ##S_x## eigenstate using experiments

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the ##S_x## eigenstates from experimental results of a spin-1 Stern-Gerlach experiment. The results yield two sets of expressions for the eigenstates, leading to a sign ambiguity that complicates their interpretation. The thread highlights the importance of conventions in quantum mechanics, particularly the choice of orthogonal vectors and the recovery of a right-handed coordinate system. It also notes that while various linear combinations can satisfy experimental results, the convention typically favors real coefficients in the ##S_z## basis. The conversation ultimately emphasizes the need for clarity in defining these states to ensure proper transformations between different spin bases.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Quantum mechanics, McIntyre, pg 62
IMG_20220426_181555.JPG

For above spin ##1## Stern Gerlach experiment a set of results is
"##
\begin{array}{c}
\mathcal{P}_{1 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 1 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4} \\
\mathcal{P}_{0 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 0 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2} \\
\mathcal{P}_{-1 x}=\left.\right|_{x}\left(-\left.1|1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4},\right.
\end{array}
##
as illustrated in Fig. 2.12. These experimental results can be used to determine the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis
##
\begin{array}{l}
|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle \\
|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle \\
|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle
\end{array}
##"To find the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis I need two more similar experiments in which the input to Sx analyzer are ##0,-1## spin particles respectively.

However I am getting a sign ambiguity while using the experimental results.

Below are two expressions which both are in line with the experiments:

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##How do we resolve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir, Doc Al and PeroK
DrClaude said:
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

So the other conventions as you mentioned are used to pick out a convenient set of orthogonal expressions ?
 
DrClaude said:
but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates
Can you also please explain this?
 
Kashmir said:
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
Yes, this would be a possibility.

Kashmir said:
Can you also please explain this?
You want, for instance, that a rotation by ##\pi/2## around the y-axis will transform ##\ket{1}_x## into ##\ket{1}_z##.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
893
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K