I Finding ##S_x## eigenstate using experiments

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the ##S_x## eigenstates from experimental results of a spin-1 Stern-Gerlach experiment. The results yield two sets of expressions for the eigenstates, leading to a sign ambiguity that complicates their interpretation. The thread highlights the importance of conventions in quantum mechanics, particularly the choice of orthogonal vectors and the recovery of a right-handed coordinate system. It also notes that while various linear combinations can satisfy experimental results, the convention typically favors real coefficients in the ##S_z## basis. The conversation ultimately emphasizes the need for clarity in defining these states to ensure proper transformations between different spin bases.
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Quantum mechanics, McIntyre, pg 62
IMG_20220426_181555.JPG

For above spin ##1## Stern Gerlach experiment a set of results is
"##
\begin{array}{c}
\mathcal{P}_{1 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 1 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4} \\
\mathcal{P}_{0 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 0 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2} \\
\mathcal{P}_{-1 x}=\left.\right|_{x}\left(-\left.1|1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4},\right.
\end{array}
##
as illustrated in Fig. 2.12. These experimental results can be used to determine the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis
##
\begin{array}{l}
|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle \\
|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle \\
|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle
\end{array}
##"To find the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis I need two more similar experiments in which the input to Sx analyzer are ##0,-1## spin particles respectively.

However I am getting a sign ambiguity while using the experimental results.

Below are two expressions which both are in line with the experiments:

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##How do we resolve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir, Doc Al and PeroK
DrClaude said:
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

So the other conventions as you mentioned are used to pick out a convenient set of orthogonal expressions ?
 
DrClaude said:
but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates
Can you also please explain this?
 
Kashmir said:
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
Yes, this would be a possibility.

Kashmir said:
Can you also please explain this?
You want, for instance, that a rotation by ##\pi/2## around the y-axis will transform ##\ket{1}_x## into ##\ket{1}_z##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
649
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
731
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K