Finding Tension in a Beam Supported by a Pulley: Solving for Equilibrium

  • Thread starter Thread starter taxidriverhk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Pulley
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
taxidriverhk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ho3pV26.jpg

[Ans: FA = -206i + 188j lb, T = 131 lb]

Homework Equations


Since it's assumed that the system is in equilibrium, so I assume that ΣF=0 and ΣM=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to draw a free-body diagram for the system, and set up three equations below:
nX4yG9y.jpg

(I don't know the direction of FA yet, so I assume that both components are in positive direction)
ΣFx = FAx + Tcos45° + Tcos30° = 0
ΣFy = FAy - 150 - W + Tsin45° + Tsin30° = 0
ΣMz [Moment centered at A] = (16)(-150 - W) + (40)(Tsin30° + Tsin45°) + (6)(Tcos30° + Tcos45°) = 0

When I solved the third equation to find tension T, it didn't give me the right answer, I am not sure which part I did wrong, maybe I missed some forces on the free-body diagram, so I made a wrong equation of ΣMz?
Any hints or approaches are much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the FBD, and when calculating the moments, you don't put W = 20 kg at mid-point along the beam...
 
SteamKing said:
To clarify what NTW was trying to tell you, you somehow neglected to include the weight of the beam in your equations of static equilibrium.
I think I had included the weight of the beam in FBD and equations, but maybe NTW is trying to tell me that the weight should be in another point along the beam?
 
taxidriverhk said:
I think I had included the weight of the beam in FBD and equations, but maybe NTW is trying to tell me that the weight should be in another point along the beam?

taxidriverhk said:

Homework Statement


Ho3pV26.jpg

[Ans: FA = -206i + 188j lb, T = 131 lb]

Homework Equations


Since it's assumed that the system is in equilibrium, so I assume that ΣF=0 and ΣM=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to draw a free-body diagram for the system, and set up three equations below:
nX4yG9y.jpg

(I don't know the direction of FA yet, so I assume that both components are in positive direction)
ΣFx = FAx + Tcos45° + Tcos30° = 0
ΣFy = FAy - 150 - W + Tsin45° + Tsin30° = 0
ΣMz [Moment centered at A] = (16)(-150 - W) + (40)(Tsin30° + Tsin45°) + (6)(Tcos30° + Tcos45°) = 0

When I solved the third equation to find tension T, it didn't give me the right answer, I am not sure which part I did wrong, maybe I missed some forces on the free-body diagram, so I made a wrong equation of ΣMz?
Any hints or approaches are much appreciated.

If the beam has a mass of 20 kg, then the weight in lbs is easy to calculate. (Hint: using 2 lbs/kg is not really acceptable. 2.2 lbs/kg is more accurate)

If the beam has a uniform cross-section, then using a c.g. of 16 in. from A is not correct either. The c.g. of a uniform bar is going to be half its length, as measured from one end.
 
taxidriverhk said:
I think I had included the weight of the beam in FBD and equations, but maybe NTW is trying to tell me that the weight should be in another point along the beam?

Exactly. Mid-point, as it's a uniform beam...