Follow-up and pipeline: definitions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RHK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definitions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
RHK
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am looking for the actual meaning of some technical/procedure words in astronomy, like:
1) Follow-up
2) Pipeline

As far I know, the follow up is the observation of an object or a field for a given amount of time, isn't it? Then, if it is, what's the difference with "standard" surveys?

On the other hand, the pipeline is "just" a term to indicate the data reduction, like what?

Any suggestion is really appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
RHK said:
1) Follow-up
Follow-up refers to 'follow-up' observations. This term is often used in the context of surveys where objects are initially detected, then require 'follow-up' by a more sensitive instrument or different type of instrument (usually a spectrometer)

RHK said:
2) Pipeline
As you say, 'pipeline' generally refers to the process of data-reduction. More specifically it usually refers to a well established, largely (or entirely) automated series of data-reduction processes associated with a particular instrument or type of data. This 'pipeline' is generally applied to virtually every element of data obtained through the given instrument. The 'pipeline' generally contains all of the basic operations that aren't especially interested to researchers. Sometimes the following stages of processing are referred to as 'post-processing' and are usually more complicated, and more situation specific --- thus requiring more involvement of the researcher.
 
Thank you. Some other questions:

zhermes said:
Follow-up refers to 'follow-up' observations. This term is often used in the context of surveys where objects are initially detected, then require 'follow-up' by a more sensitive instrument or different type of instrument (usually a spectrometer)

So, every follow up survey naturally brings to multi-wavelengths catalogues, right?

zhermes said:
As you say, 'pipeline' generally refers to the process of data-reduction. More specifically it usually refers to a well established, largely (or entirely) automated series of data-reduction processes associated with a particular instrument or type of data. This 'pipeline' is generally applied to virtually every element of data obtained through the given instrument. The 'pipeline' generally contains all of the basic operations that aren't especially interested to researchers. Sometimes the following stages of processing are referred to as 'post-processing' and are usually more complicated, and more situation specific --- thus requiring more involvement of the researcher.

Is it possible for you to give a "simple" example of data reduction (with programs, procedures, etc.)? FITS files are reduced files?
 
RHK said:
So, every follow up survey naturally brings to multi-wavelengths catalogues, right?
That's generally the way it goes.

RHK said:
Is it possible for you to give a "simple" example of data reduction (with programs, procedures, etc.)? FITS files are reduced files?
The top section of this webpage might be informative: http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/div/ir-interferometry/lndrs/index.html

FITS files can (and often are) used at all stages.
 
Last edited by a moderator: