Form of potential operator of two interacting particles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of the potential operator for two interacting particles in a three-dimensional space, focusing on the mathematical representation within the context of quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of using the tensor product of individual Hilbert spaces and the position representation of the potential operator.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the concept of the Hilbert space for two interacting particles as a tensor product of their individual Hilbert spaces.
  • Another participant suggests that the potential operator is most straightforwardly expressed in the position representation, providing a mathematical expression involving the potential function and the wave function.
  • A later reply acknowledges the previous expression but seeks an abstract representation involving the tensor product of individual spaces.
  • Further, a participant reformulates the potential operator in terms of the tensor product and discusses its application in defining the two-particle wave function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to share an understanding of the mathematical framework but express different preferences for the representation of the potential operator, indicating that multiple views on the formulation exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the choice between different representations of the potential operator, and assumptions regarding the applicability of the tensor product in this context remain unaddressed.

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Considering two interacting particles in 3d, the corresponding Hilbert space ##H## is the tensor product of the two individual Hilbert spaces of the two particles.
If the particle interaction is given by a potential ##V(\mathbf r_1 -\mathbf r_2)## ,what is the corresponding potential operator for it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's most simple in the position representation
$$V(\hat{\vec{r}}_1-\hat{\vec{r}_2}) \psi(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2)=V(\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2) \psi(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir
vanhees71 said:
It's most simple in the position representation
$$V(\hat{\vec{r}}_1-\hat{\vec{r}_2}) \psi(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2)=V(\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2) \psi(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2).$$
Thank you. I was looking for the abstract expression involving the tensor product of individual spaces.
 
If you write it in this way, it just reads
$$V(\hat{\vec{r}}_1 \otimes \hat{1} - \hat{1} \otimes \hat{\vec{r}}_2) |\vec{r}_1 \rangle \otimes |\vec{r}_2 \rangle = V(\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2) |\vec{r}_1 \rangle \otimes |\vec{r}_2 \rangle.$$
Now you use it in the definition of the two-particle wave function,
$$\psi(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2) = \langle \vec{r}_1| \otimes \langle \vec{r}_2|\psi \rangle.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
991
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
936
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K