- #1
BadBrain
- 196
- 1
Like they're difficult to find!
(OK, so I realize I'm going out on a limb here, considering the pounding I recently took in the "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 goes to Saul Perlmutter Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess" thread under General Discussion in the Lounge, but, well, I'll cast caution to the wind here.)
***
Anyways, on the Science Channel's show "How the Universe Works" episode entitled "Extreme Stars", somebody said that all the atoms in your body were manufactured inside stars.
This seems, to me, to be extremely unlikely, as 80% of our bodies consists of water, each molecule of which contains two hydrogen atoms.
If hydrogen is, at least in the non-decadent stages of their lives, the primary fuel of stars, then how can the existence of hydrogen be dependent on the existence of stars, or logically precede them temporally?
This is no chicken-and-egg question, as it's a bit like saying that the existence of petroleum is dependent upon the existence of automobiles.
(I really hope I got this one right!)
(OK, so I realize I'm going out on a limb here, considering the pounding I recently took in the "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 goes to Saul Perlmutter Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess" thread under General Discussion in the Lounge, but, well, I'll cast caution to the wind here.)
***
Anyways, on the Science Channel's show "How the Universe Works" episode entitled "Extreme Stars", somebody said that all the atoms in your body were manufactured inside stars.
This seems, to me, to be extremely unlikely, as 80% of our bodies consists of water, each molecule of which contains two hydrogen atoms.
If hydrogen is, at least in the non-decadent stages of their lives, the primary fuel of stars, then how can the existence of hydrogen be dependent on the existence of stars, or logically precede them temporally?
This is no chicken-and-egg question, as it's a bit like saying that the existence of petroleum is dependent upon the existence of automobiles.
(I really hope I got this one right!)