Foundations of Physics, the magazine, open access articles.

Click For Summary
Foundations of Physics, an open-access magazine launched in January 2007 with Gerardus ‘t Hooft as editor-in-chief, offers free access to its January and February 2007 issues. The publication features notable articles, including R. Tumulka's work on the "Free Will Theorem" and Klauber's comparison of relativistic rotation theories. A contributor shared a frustrating experience with the submission process, highlighting a year-long wait for a rejection without feedback. This raises concerns about the editorial efficiency and communication within the journal. Overall, the magazine aims to provide valuable insights into foundational physics topics while facing challenges in the peer review process.
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for posting this, Hans!

(For anyone interested in the so-called "Free Will Theorem" and EPR, I recommend a look at R. Tumulka's article in the Feb 2007 issue.)
 
For those interested in relativity:
Klauber: "Relativistic Rotation: A Comparison of Theories" in the Feb 2007 edition looks very interesting. :smile:
 
Information for authors.
Two years ago I was send my article to Foundation of Physics.
In the answer the editor asked me the names of five referee which suitable in my opinion. I write the names of five and wait one year! When one year is finish I send E-mail to Editor and ask him What is with my paper. Yes or no?
After that Editor answer me that my paper is not suitable. But one year is pass before I have the answer no! It is a black hole!
 
Last edited:
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K