Fuel usage to accelerate to 20 mph

  • Thread starter Thread starter zanes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerate Fuel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the fuel consumption required to accelerate a small car (3000 lbs) from a complete stop to 20 mph, with the aim of advocating for the elimination of unnecessary stop signs to reduce national fuel consumption. The calculations involve Newton's equations of motion and the energy density of petrol, estimating that approximately 3 ml of fuel is needed for this acceleration, costing between 0.4 to 0.5 euro cents. The conversation highlights the inefficiency of cars and suggests that many stop signs may contribute to excessive fuel waste, emphasizing the need for empirical data to support these claims.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's equations of motion
  • Understanding of work and energy concepts
  • Basic knowledge of fuel energy density (e.g., petrol at 35MJ/l)
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating fuel consumption during acceleration
  • Explore the impact of stop signs on fuel efficiency
  • Learn about CO2 emissions calculations related to fuel consumption
  • Investigate empirical data collection techniques for automotive fuel usage
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for environmental advocates, automotive engineers, and policymakers interested in fuel efficiency and traffic management strategies aimed at reducing unnecessary fuel consumption.

zanes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In an effort to approach the EPA on the subject of eliminating unnecessary stop signs in an effort to reduce fuel consumption nationally, I am trying to determine approximately how much fuel is required to accelerate from a dead stop to 20 mph. With all the variables (vehicle weight, acceleration rate, etc.) , I would simply like to take a small car (3000 lbs) that would normally be in the 30mpg range for city driving at a "normal" acceleration rate. With such a number in hand, calculating the minimum fuel savings given the traffic counts at any given stop sign could be easily computed. I strongly suspect that there are millions of unnecessary stop signs in the U.S., and that eliminating them would save many millions of gallons of wasted fuel. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Zanes
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Do you know Newton's equations of motion? The definition (mathematical) of work? You'll need to make an assumption about how fast the acceleration is, but after that, it is a pretty straightforward calculation. Why don't you give it a try and we'll see if/where you get hung up.
 
I think this site is out of my depth. In math I didn't get much beyond the Pythagorean Theorem, and finding the hypotenuse doesn't seem to be germaine to the problem. Looks like Plan B, empirical data, is in my future. If I accelerate my car to 20mph, then decelerate to 0mph 100 times, then refill my tank, then drive the same route at 20mph, filling my tank a second time, I can get my answer (and wear out my brakes.) Thank you for responding, though. Zane Suedmeyer
 
I don't think this experiment will give reasonable data with just 100 stops.

The kinetic energy of 1000kg, moving at 10m/s (a bit more than 20mph), is E=1/2mv^2 = 50kJ. Cars are quite inefficient, so we can assume at least 100kJ required energy in the fuel. Petrol has an energy density of about 35MJ/l, therefore 100kJ correspond to 1/350l or about 3ml. With 1.4€ to 1.7€ per liter (roughly the price in Germany), this costs 0.4 to 0.5 (euro)cents.
All calculations are easy without a calculator. SI units are so nice ;).
 
zanes said:
I think this site is out of my depth. In math I didn't get much beyond the Pythagorean Theorem...
Didn't Algebra I come before geometry?

This site can help anyone who is willing to learn, regardless of their current knowledge level.
 
You might want to consider converting mfb's excellent answer into CO2 emissions. You would have a politically more attractive argument if you use CO2 rather than cents.
 
Only the very largest of ships diesel engines achieve a thermal efficiency of 50% the conversion factor for a car engine is more like 25% at reduced throttle openings.
 
I venture that 70% of the driving population drive in such a way as to negate the advantages of new fuel mileage technologies.

They will not change driving habits to get the most out of the technology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K