Galous Group Modules Self Study: Q&A

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tohauz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Modules
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
tohauz
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was doing some self study and have questions:
1. p(x)=x^{7}+11 over Q(a), R.
where a is 7-th root of unity. What are Galouis groups?
For the 1st case I got Z_{7}, second not sure. need hint for that
2. need hint. I know it is easy: M is an R-module. Show that Hom_{R}(R,M)[tex]\cong[/tex]M.
3. Spse that I is an ideal of R such that I^{k}=0 for some k>0 integer. Let M, N be R-modules and let [tex]\phi[/tex]:M->N be an R-module hom. Prove that if induced map [tex]\bar{\phi}[/tex]:M/IM->N/IN is surjective, then [tex]\phi[/tex] is surjective.
4. show that 2[tex]\otimes[/tex]1 [tex]\neq[/tex]0 in 2Z[tex]\otimes[/tex]Z/2Z.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. You need a map from

{f : R-->M } to M

(or vice versa).Assuming that R is unital, then there is only one possible map you can write down:

f ---> f(1)

You have to try to show that is an isomorphism. You also may want to think about the other direction;

M --> {f: R --> M}

again, there is only one possible map you can write down - given m in M, then the only candidate in Hom_R(R,M) is translation by m:

f_m(r)= r.m

so you have to show that the map m--->f_m is an isomorphism (note we've dropped the explicit use use R being unital).
 
matt grime said:
2. You need a map from

{f : R-->M } to M

(or vice versa).


Assuming that R is unital, then there is only one possible map you can write down:

f ---> f(1)
This is what I tried. g(f)=f_{1}. But I had hard time showing that it is surjective
 
matt grime said:
Have you tried working to find an inverse? The second part of my hint wasn't just decoration.

yeah, i got it. thanks
 
#3 is somewhat tricky. The key is to prove that [tex]\varphi(IM) = IN[/tex]. This can be done by induction on [tex]k[/tex], but first you'll need a lemma to the effect that if [tex]\bar{\varphi}[/tex] is surjective, then the induced map [tex]\psi_r : I^r M/I^{r+1} \to I^r N/I^{r+1}[/tex] is surjective for all [tex]r[/tex].

Let me think about the others some more...I'll get back to you in a bit. (Although #4 looks pretty trivial.)
 
Last edited: