Gas liquifaction unit of minimum dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy S.
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
Timothy S.
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
What type of gas liquifaction units has the least dimensions and mass?
What type of operated gas liquifaction units has (things being equal) the least dimensions, mass and is easiest to transport?

Thank you
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Isaacpalmer
Engineering news on Phys.org
What kind of volume of gas do you need to produce with this installation? What is the application?

1742835334936.png

https://www.rtgastreat.com/natural-gas-liquefaction-skid-product/
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
Also, what gas(es) are you looking to liquify? Because something like propane is going to have very different requirements than, say, methane.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
Flyboy said:
Also, what gas(es) are you looking to liquify? Because something like propane is going to have very different requirements than, say, methane.
I am speaking of methane
 
That’s… a lot.

You’re talking industrial scale for 5kg/s flow rate.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
So 5kg/s is 432 tons per day (TPD). This link shows a 280 TPD plant that was for sale. It doesn't say what it cost, but I suspect many millions of $
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S., Tom.G and PeroK
Turboexpander-based liquefaction units generally offer the least dimensions and mass for their capacity, making them compact and relatively easier to transport, especially at small to mid-scale. For ultra-portable systems, Joule-Thomson (JT) coolers and mixed-refrigerant systems are also contenders due to their simplicity and compact design, though with lower efficiency.