Gas liquifaction unit of minimum dimensions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy S.
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the types of gas liquefaction units that have minimal dimensions, mass, and ease of transport, particularly focusing on the liquefaction of methane. Participants explore various factors influencing the design and capacity of these units, including flow rates and specific gas types.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the type of gas liquefaction unit that is smallest and easiest to transport.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the volume of gas needed and the application of the liquefaction unit.
  • Some participants note that different gases, such as propane and methane, have varying requirements for liquefaction.
  • A participant specifies that their theoretical installation aims to produce approximately 5 kg of liquid methane per second for rapid fueling.
  • Concerns are raised about the industrial scale of a 5 kg/s flow rate, equating to 432 tons per day.
  • One participant suggests that turboexpander-based liquefaction units are compact and easier to transport, while also mentioning Joule-Thomson coolers and mixed-refrigerant systems as alternatives, albeit with lower efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the best type of liquefaction unit, with no consensus reached on a single optimal solution. The discussion remains open regarding the specific requirements and applications of different gas types.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined the assumptions regarding the operational conditions or specific design parameters for the liquefaction units being discussed.

Timothy S.
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
What type of gas liquifaction units has the least dimensions and mass?
What type of operated gas liquifaction units has (things being equal) the least dimensions, mass and is easiest to transport?

Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Isaacpalmer
Engineering news on Phys.org
What kind of volume of gas do you need to produce with this installation? What is the application?

1742835334936.png

https://www.rtgastreat.com/natural-gas-liquefaction-skid-product/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
Also, what gas(es) are you looking to liquify? Because something like propane is going to have very different requirements than, say, methane.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
Flyboy said:
Also, what gas(es) are you looking to liquify? Because something like propane is going to have very different requirements than, say, methane.
I am speaking of methane
 
That’s… a lot.

You’re talking industrial scale for 5kg/s flow rate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S.
So 5kg/s is 432 tons per day (TPD). This link shows a 280 TPD plant that was for sale. It doesn't say what it cost, but I suspect many millions of $
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Timothy S., Tom.G and PeroK
Turboexpander-based liquefaction units generally offer the least dimensions and mass for their capacity, making them compact and relatively easier to transport, especially at small to mid-scale. For ultra-portable systems, Joule-Thomson (JT) coolers and mixed-refrigerant systems are also contenders due to their simplicity and compact design, though with lower efficiency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K