[tex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

\left[\begin{array}{c}

y'_1(x) \\ \vdots \\ y'_n(x) \\

\end{array}\right]

=

\left[\begin{array}{ccc}

f_{11}(y) & \cdots & f_{1n}(y) \\

\vdots & & \vdots \\

f_{n1}(y) & \cdots & f_{nn}(y) \\

\end{array}\right]

\left[\begin{array}{c}

g_1(x) \\ \vdots \\ g_n(x) \\

\end{array}\right]

[/tex]

If n=1, then this can be solved with the separation technique. Suppose n>1 and that [itex]f[/itex] is invertible. Could the separation technique be generalized to give some explicit formula for solution y(x)? I tried without success. Anyone dealt with problems like this ever?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Generalizing separation technique

Loading...

Similar Threads - Generalizing separation technique | Date |
---|---|

I Find the General solution of H.D.E | Feb 13, 2017 |

I What are the generalized Sundman transformations? | Jul 27, 2016 |

I Is this general solution correct? | Jun 20, 2016 |

General Question About a System of DE's | Oct 29, 2015 |

Separable equation constant generality. | Aug 25, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**