GNU Octave vs Wolfram Alpha

  • Thread starter Thread starter earamsey
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion compares GNU Octave and Wolfram Alpha as mathematical tools for learning and usage. Users find GNU Octave's plotting capabilities, particularly for functions like the floor function, to be complicated and sometimes inaccurate. In contrast, Wolfram Alpha provides a straightforward and accurate plotting experience with natural language processing features. The consensus leans towards recommending Wolfram Alpha's Personal edition for its affordability and ease of use over the quirks of GNU Octave.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of mathematical functions and plotting
  • Familiarity with GNU Octave version specifics
  • Knowledge of Wolfram Alpha's natural language processing capabilities
  • Awareness of software licensing models and subscription services
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore GNU Octave plotting functions and their limitations
  • Investigate Wolfram Alpha's Personal edition features and pricing
  • Learn about alternative mathematical software packages and their comparisons
  • Research user experiences and reviews of GNU Octave and Wolfram Alpha
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics or engineering seeking effective tools for mathematical computations and visualizations.

earamsey
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
trying to choose software for mathematics
I am trying to find a worthwhile math package to learn and use. Matlib is just too expensive so it's out of the question. GNU Octave is OK but has simple stuff like plot can be complicated. For example GNU Octave plot of floor function is:
plot1.webp

which is wrong. But the same plot of Wolfram Alpha is simple and accurate:
plot2.webp

I did not have to do any fiddling with results to get proper graph. Also, I like the natural language of Wolfram and it's mostly affordable. In short, is it worth learning GNU Octave and all it's quirks or should I just pay for Wolfram Alpha Personal edition, annually.

PS: Please excuse me if this is inappropiate post I'm kind of oldie but newbie to this forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You only have to pay annually if you want updates. I have been using the same version for about 5 years now.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and Office_Shredder

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K