Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Government Private Contractors Now Outnumber Government Employees

  1. Feb 4, 2007 #1
    It is time to crack down on the number of government contractors. Many that we have currently are of questionable honesty. They, as the llink suggests, have become a fourth branch of government. CACI International, the one the GSA just hired to investigate other contractors was recently under investigation.

    Outsourcing the work of government agencies is nothing new, but it has doubled since 2000. It is also time to take a closer look at the contractor selection process.

    Even the National Security Agency outsources heavily.

    Last edited: Feb 4, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 5, 2007 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't get it - if the government were to directly do everything governments do, we'd be communist. Should we nationalize Boeing?

    The problem isn't contractors (directly - they do, of course all need leashes), it is stupid government policies for how to hire them. Governments waste money on everything they do and this is just another example of the same problem. Should we nationalize Lockheed because the F22 is too expensive? No, we should fix the laws governing procurement so that it doesn't cost so much to develop. The F117 was an incredibly economical project ($40m apiece, on a short production run), largely because it was developed outside normal government procurement rules.
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2007
  4. Feb 5, 2007 #3
    It appears that CACI international, the company awarded the GSA contact, has been doing lots of nasty little jobs for the government. They were one of the private contractors who providded civilian interrogators at Abu Garaib.:mad:

  5. Feb 5, 2007 #4
    I agree with that Russ. But it is not just the big military contractors, the whole privitization scenario has left the companies who work for governent agencies with too much power. Like the article says, they have become a fourth branch of government.

    We are hiring contractors to audit contractors, whats next?, Hire contractors to audit the auditors.
  6. Feb 5, 2007 #5


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It's a catch-22: if the government were efficient enough to be able to manage their subcontractors properly, it'd be efficient enough that it wouldn't need so many anyway. Boeing is a manufacturing company and you are, of course, mostly talking about service companies. The government is big enough that it should be able to realize a benefit to in-house service companies for things like securty and food service. But the reason it can't is the same reason it can't manage the subs either.
  7. Feb 6, 2007 #6
    I wonder at the real costs
    like in iraq a guard or truck driver
    can be paid 100k a year if a usa citizen
    but what does the CORP bill our goverment
    for the persons service 250k ??
  8. Feb 6, 2007 #7
    Im not so sure that you understand this russ. Companies like black water and many others have been contracted out by the government to do many of the jobs in Iraq that our troops previously did. They pull security, are basically singlehandedly in charge of supplies and even have built many r&r camps. This is a huge problem because contractors arent subject to the same standards as the military. This means that if they break a country's law they are simply fired, no real punishment. They can also just up and leave at any time. This leaves a real uncertanty on the battlefield because what happens if it gets too hot and your supply contractor says see you later. There has also been at least one major incident with the security teams. They dont need authorization to travel throughout the country, and back in 2003 5 security agents drove the fallujah and were slaughtered. This directly caused the marines to change their plan for attacking fallujah. Actually watch this its where I am getting most of this, its very interesting.
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2007
  9. Feb 6, 2007 #8


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That is a problem, but it isn't the problem the OP was discussing. The article makes a passing reference to it, but the main point is the money.
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2007
  10. Feb 6, 2007 #9
    The past is the past yet it certainly needs to be investigated. The problem is The GSA has given a contract to a company which exhibited questionable behavior in Iraq to do the investigating.

    In addition the investigations go far beyond Iraq and Katrina.

    Non profit organizations who work in the interest of the people have done an admirable job exposing corruption in numerous situations. The news media has also contributed to this area. They usually do so by using the Freedom of Information act to obtain government information and data. They can not do this with private companies.

    Private companies are exempt from the FOIA. With the vast amount of outsourced government contracts, even in the area of national security, this leaves us plunging deeper and deeper into a secret government.

    Again as the article stated, private contractors have become a fourth branch of government and are quite apparently not held accountable to any one except perhaps another private company.
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2007
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Government Private Contractors Now Outnumber Government Employees
  1. Australia's government (Replies: 12)

  2. Iraq now governs itself (Replies: 30)

  3. Iraq's government (Replies: 22)

  4. Private contractors (Replies: 39)

  5. Government spending (Replies: 40)