Gravimetric Analysis Homework: Mass % of Barium Ions in Mixture

  • Thread starter Thread starter leah3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass percent of barium ions in an impure mixture using gravimetric analysis. The user determined the number of moles of barium sulfate produced and calculated the mass of barium ions, arriving at a mass percent of 4.79%. A typo in the mass of barium sulfate was identified, which led to some confusion in calculations. It was emphasized that the molar ratio between barium and barium sulfate is 1:1, simplifying the problem. Overall, the user is on the right track with their approach to the homework.
leah3000
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An aqueous solution containing 1.728g of an impure mixture was analysed for barium ions by adding sufficient sulphuric acid solution to completely precipitate the barium ions as its sulphate. The precipitate was filtered, washed and dried to constant mass and finally weighed. What is the mass percent of barium ions in the mixture, if 0.408g of dried barium sulphate was obtained?


Homework Equations



I used this as the balanced equation but somehow it looks funny to me...

BaX + H2SO4 ------> BaSO4 + HX
1.728g 0.1408g

The Attempt at a Solution



no of mols BaSO4 produced = mass/Mr

Mr of BaSo4= (137.3)+ (32.1) + (16x4)
= 233.4

mols= 0.1408/233.4
=6.033x10^-4

BaX : BaSO4
1 : 1

mass Ba^2+ = molsx Mr
=(6.033x10^-4) x 137.3
=0.0828g

% of Ba^2+ present in mixture= (0.0828/1.728) x100
= 4.79%

Am i on the right track? Plz help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi leah3000! :smile:

You are very much on the right track!

Only one thing: you seem to have made a typo followed by the corresponding calculation errors when you wrote 0.1480 instead of 0.480.
 
oops. thanks for the help
 
The only thing that matters is that molar ratio between barium and barium sulfate is 1:1. This is enough to solve the problem.

Also note that while it is perfectly correct to convert everything to moles and back to masses, it is not necessary. See stoichiometric calculations using ratios for details.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top