Gravitational Time Dilation: What is R in the Equation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ilikescience94
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of gravitational time dilation, specifically the variable R in the equation T=T0/(sqrt(1-2GM/(Rc^2))). R represents the distance from the center of a spherical object, such as a planet or star. For example, to calculate gravitational time dilation at Earth's surface, R is set to approximately 6400 kilometers. The discussion highlights the distinction between R in the Schwarzschild equation and the physical measurement of radius due to the effects of curved space in general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the Schwarzschild equation
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational fields
  • Concept of coordinate time versus proper time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Schwarzschild metric in detail
  • Explore the implications of curved space on measurements
  • Learn about gravitational time dilation effects near massive bodies
  • Investigate the relationship between circumference and radius in curved geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the effects of gravity on time measurement and general relativity concepts.

ilikescience94
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm trying to understand gravitational time dilation, but can not find a good explanation for what R equals in the equation:

T=T0/(sqrt(1-2GM/(Rc^2)))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That formula is for the time dilation in the gravitational field of a spherical object (like a star or a planet) compared with the time measured by a far away observer.

##R## is just the distance from the center of the object (although there is a subtlety here, which I won't go into until you're happy with the simple answer). So if you wanted to calculate the gravitational time dilation at the surface of the Earth you'd set ##R## equal to the radius of the earth, about 6400 kilometers.
 
If you had a large ring centred on the centre of a gravitational body and measured the circumference of the ring, then dividing the circumference by 2*pi gives R as defined in the Schwarzschild equation you mentioned. ##T_0## is the time measured by a clock attached to the (non rotating) ring and T is the coordinate time measured by an observer at infinity.

This is trivially true in flat space, but in general relativity, R as defined in this metric is not the same as what you would obtain if you measured the radius of the ring using a tape measure from the centre of the body to the ring. (This is probably the subtlety that Nugatory is alluding to). This is because Euclidean geometry no longer works in curved space.
 
Last edited:
yuiop said:
(This is probably the subtlety that Nugatory is alluding to)

yes, that's it. It's not a big deal for weak gravitational fields (planets, ordinary stars, ...) but it matters a lot in stronger gravitational fields.
 
Nugatory said:
That formula is for the time dilation in the gravitational field of a spherical object (like a star or a planet) compared with the time measured by a far away observer.

##R## is just the distance from the center of the object (although there is a subtlety here, which I won't go into until you're happy with the simple answer). So if you wanted to calculate the gravitational time dilation at the surface of the Earth you'd set ##R## equal to the radius of the earth, about 6400 kilometers.

Thank you, I like this, and how would I find this new R rather than simply the radius?
 
ilikescience94 said:
Thank you, I like this, and how would I find this new R rather than simply the radius?

yuiop said:
If you had a large ring centred on the centre of a gravitational body and measured the circumference of the ring, then dividing the circumference by 2*pi gives R as defined in the Schwarzschild equation you mentioned.

You might have missed the answer, yuiop gave it already though.
 
pervect said:
You might have missed the answer, yuiop gave it already though.

I am not a smart man.
 
No need to dis yourself for missing a response, it's easy enough to miss forum responses by being in a hurry, or by having them "sneak in" in front of something you've read.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K