B Gravitons vs photons: Does the size of the atom make any difference?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Josiah
  • Start date Start date
Josiah
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Does the size of the atom make any difference?
Hi, does the size of the atom make any difference to whether a photon gets absorbed or not? Hence would that be the same for a graviton.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An atom isn’t a little round ball so we want to be cautious about using words like “size” - there’s a notion of atomic size but it’s not quite like what we mean when we talk about the size of a billiard ball.

Whether a photon is absorbed or scattered by an atom depends on how it interacts with the individual charged particles that make up the atom, and these are close to (in the case of the electron exactly, as far as we know) point particles. So the answer to your question is somewhere between “that’s not a good way of thinking about it” and “no”.
 
Last edited:
Does the atomic mass of an atom change the amount of photons it absorbs? ie if the photons kick electrons into a higher energy level, doesn't the number of electrons in the atom mean more photons get aborbed
 
Nugatory said:
An atom isn’t a little round ball so we want to be cautious about using words like “size” - there’s a notion of atomic size but it’s not quite like what we mean when we talk about the size of a billiard ball.

Whether a photon is absorbed or scattered by an atom depends on how it interacts with the individual charged particles that make up the atom, and these are close to (in the case of the electron exactly, as far as we know) point particles. So the answer to your question is somewhere between “that’s not a good way of thinking about it” and “no”.
how about electrons? Does the number of electrons change the way a photon gets absorbed?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top