H|0> = 0? Does that mean that zero-point is ZERO?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of normal ordering the Hamiltonian in quantum field theory (QFT) and its effect on the zero-point energy. Participants explore the concept of vacuum energy, the treatment of infinities in calculations, and the relationship between the ground state and excited states in the context of QFT.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that normal ordering the Hamiltonian leads to it annihilating the lowest energy state, implying that the energy is effectively zero instead of 1/2.
  • Others argue that measuring energy relative to the vacuum energy is akin to redefining the zero point of potential energy, which avoids issues with diverging integrals when calculating total energy.
  • One participant questions the origin of infinities in the integration process, particularly when moving to higher energy states and suggests that dividing energy by volume is a way to address this.
  • Another participant points out that even after dividing by volume, the vacuum energy diverges due to the integration over an infinite number of modes in k-space.
  • Some participants discuss how subtracting the vacuum term from the Hamiltonian yields finite results for states with non-zero particle numbers, indicating that the ground state contribution cancels out in calculations involving excited states.
  • There is a query about whether the Hamiltonian remains infinite after subtracting the ground state energy and whether the notation |q> corresponds to a specific evaluation in the scalar field integral.
  • One participant provides a simplified form of the Hamiltonian and emphasizes the need to correctly order operators to achieve finite results in calculations involving particle states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the treatment of zero-point energy and the implications of normal ordering, with no consensus reached on the resolution of infinities or the correctness of specific mathematical approaches.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps regarding the treatment of infinities in energy calculations and the dependence on definitions of vacuum energy and ground state contributions.

LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
In QFT after the Hamiltonian is normal ordered I guess when acting on the lowest energy state it annihilates it. So doesn't that mean the energy is zero now instead of 1/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially, what you are doing is measuring the energy in the field relative to the energy of the vacuum. It is exactly like changing the 0 point of your potential energy in introductory physics. The vacuum energy density is constant, so one can just measure relative to it to avoid the diverging integral that appears when you try to calculate the total energy in the field. What has really happened, behind the scenes, is a redefinition of the Hamiltonian:

H \rightarrow H - <0|H|0>
 
Well doesn't the infinity arise because your integrating over infinity. What happens when the next state is reached? Now your integrating a non-zero value over infinity again.

I thought the way of dealing with this was dividing the energy by the volume of the space in order to get the density. Essentially dividing infinity by infinity.
 
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating \omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2} over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.
 
G01 said:
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating \omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2} over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.

Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?
 
LostConjugate said:
Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?

You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: <q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q> where H_o is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from <q|H|q>.
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: <q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q> where H_o is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from <q|H|q>.

Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_p

Which is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?
 
LostConjugate said:
Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_pWhich is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?

Your Hamiltonian will not change from the previous case. Simplified, it should look like:

H=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p+H_o

(If you need a text reference check out Srednicki Chapter 3. )

Thus, H-H_o=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_pa_p

Remember that |q>=a^+(q)|0>

So, you need to work out:

(H-H_o)|q>=(H-H_o)a^+_q|0>=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p a^+_q|0>

Put the operators in the correct order and you should end up with a finite result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K