H|0> = 0? Does that mean that zero-point is ZERO?

  • Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mean Zero
In summary, the Hamiltonian in QFT is redefined in order to avoid the diverging integral that appears when calculating the total energy in the field. This is similar to changing the 0 point of potential energy in introductory physics. The vacuum energy density remains constant, so measuring relative to it can avoid the infinity arising from integrating over an infinite number of modes. However, this does not solve the issue completely, as there is still an infinity arising from the k-space integral. Subtracting the ground state energy from the Hamiltonian can solve this problem, allowing for finite results in non-zero particle states. However, this process involves complex mathematical calculations.
  • #1
LostConjugate
850
3
In QFT after the Hamiltonian is normal ordered I guess when acting on the lowest energy state it annihilates it. So doesn't that mean the energy is zero now instead of 1/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Essentially, what you are doing is measuring the energy in the field relative to the energy of the vacuum. It is exactly like changing the 0 point of your potential energy in introductory physics. The vacuum energy density is constant, so one can just measure relative to it to avoid the diverging integral that appears when you try to calculate the total energy in the field. What has really happened, behind the scenes, is a redefinition of the Hamiltonian:

[tex]H \rightarrow H - <0|H|0>[/tex]
 
  • #3
Well doesn't the infinity arise because your integrating over infinity. What happens when the next state is reached? Now your integrating a non-zero value over infinity again.

I thought the way of dealing with this was dividing the energy by the volume of the space in order to get the density. Essentially dividing infinity by infinity.
 
  • #4
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

[tex]<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)[/tex]

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating [itex]\omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2}[/itex] over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.
 
  • #5
G01 said:
Try working out the zero point energy for the scalar field. You'll get:

[tex]<0|H|0>=V\int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega(k)[/tex]

Even after you divide by the volume V, the energy of the vacuum still diverges because you are integrating [itex]\omega(k)=\sqrt{\vec{k}^2+m^2}[/itex] over an infinite number of modes.

So you may be able to cancel out the infinity arising from the spatial integral, but not the one arising from the k-space integral.

Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?
 
  • #6
LostConjugate said:
Ok so making the ground state 0 solves the problem. But what about the second state?

You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: [itex]<q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q>[/itex] where [itex]H_o[/itex] is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from [itex]<q|H|q>[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #7
G01 said:
You mean the 1 particle state?

The vacuum term is the same in the states with non zero particle number. Once you subtract it off the Hamiltonian once, you will get finite results for your non-zero particle states. For instance work out: [itex]<q|H'|q>=<q|H - H_o|q>[/itex] where [itex]H_o[/itex] is the groundstate energy defined above.

You will see that the ground state contribution cancels exactly with a term from [itex]<q|H|q>[/itex].

Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

[tex] H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_p [/tex]

Which is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?
 
  • #8
LostConjugate said:
Sorry for my poor math knowledge.

Is this correct?

[tex] H-H_o = \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4} k_p a_p^\dagger a_p [/tex]Which is still infinite? Is |q> the same as the scalar field integral evaluated at p=1?

Your Hamiltonian will not change from the previous case. Simplified, it should look like:

[tex]H=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p+H_o[/tex]

(If you need a text reference check out Srednicki Chapter 3. )

Thus, [tex]H-H_o=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_pa_p[/tex]

Remember that [itex]|q>=a^+(q)|0>[/itex]

So, you need to work out:

[tex](H-H_o)|q>=(H-H_o)a^+_q|0>=\int d^3p \omega_p a^+_p a_p a^+_q|0>[/tex]

Put the operators in the correct order and you should end up with a finite result.
 

1. What does the equation H|0> = 0 mean?

The equation H|0> = 0 represents the state of the zero-point energy of a quantum mechanical system. It means that the energy of the system is at its lowest possible value, also known as the ground state.

2. Does this equation imply that the zero-point energy is equal to zero?

No, the equation H|0> = 0 does not mean that the zero-point energy is equal to zero. It simply represents the state of the energy at its minimum value. The actual value of the zero-point energy depends on the specific system and cannot be zero for all systems.

3. Can you explain the concept of zero-point energy?

Zero-point energy is a concept in quantum mechanics that describes the lowest possible energy state of a system. It arises from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that there is always a minimum amount of energy associated with any physical system, even at absolute zero temperature.

4. How does zero-point energy affect physical systems?

Zero-point energy has various effects on physical systems, such as contributing to the stability of atoms and molecules, influencing the properties of materials, and causing the Casimir effect. It also plays a role in quantum fluctuations and the uncertainty principle.

5. Is zero-point energy a real or theoretical concept?

Zero-point energy is a real concept in quantum mechanics. It has been observed and measured in various physical systems, and its effects have been confirmed through experiments and calculations. However, it is a difficult concept to understand and visualize, as it is not directly observable in our macroscopic world.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
640
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
994
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
693
Replies
1
Views
531
Replies
1
Views
816
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
735
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
649
Replies
5
Views
782
Back
Top