Undergrad Hamiltonian of a particle moving on the surface of a sphere

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian of a spin-1 particle constrained to move on the surface of a sphere, expressed as H=ω/ħ L². The original Hamiltonian for such a particle is H=L²/(2mR²), leading to the conclusion that ω must equal ħ/(2mR²) for consistency. The dimensional analysis confirms that ω has the correct units of s⁻¹. The participants seek to establish the validity of this relationship and clarify the role of ω as a parameter. The conclusion affirms that ω is indeed defined as ħ/(2mR²).
Salmone
Messages
101
Reaction score
13
In a quantum mechanical exercise, I found the following Hamiltonian:

Consider a particle of spin 1 constrained to move on the surface of a sphere of radius R with Hamiltonian ##H=\frac{\omega}{\hbar}L^2##. I knew that the Hamiltonian of a particle bound to move on the surface of a sphere was ##H=\frac{L^2}{2mR^2}## and then to get the same Hamiltonian should be ##\omega=\frac{\hbar}{2mR^2}## which dimensionally fits, but is it right? How can this equality be proved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you write yourself, it's just a definition for a parameter ##\omega##. So what should be right or wrong with it?
 
@vanhees71 So ##\omega## is just a parameter which should be equal to ##\frac{\hbar}{2mR^2}## and with dimensions ##s^{-1}##
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K