Harnessing Reusable Energy from Rotating System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of harnessing reusable energy from a rotating cylinder system, specifically exploring the potential for attaching a dynamo to generate power from the system's rotation. Participants examine the implications of energy consumption, the effects of inertia, and the concept of flywheel energy storage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Prakash inquires about the possibility of attaching a dynamo to a rotating cylinder to generate power, questioning whether this could yield significant energy.
  • Some participants assert that attaching a dynamo would require increasing the motor's power input, as energy cannot be created from nothing, citing the conservation of energy principle.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of power consumption in the system, with Prakash seeking clarification on whether energy is consumed due to inertia, resistance from cotton, or both.
  • Participants mention that while a flywheel effect can store energy, it does not continuously generate energy and can only provide energy when slowed down.
  • One suggestion includes using a clutch to engage a dynamo when the machine is switched off, potentially allowing for some energy recovery, though it is noted that this would likely be minimal compared to the energy input over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principle of conservation of energy and the limitations of energy generation from the system. However, there are differing views on the potential for energy recovery through flywheel effects and the practicality of using a dynamo in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific energy losses in the system and the assumptions about the motor's operation and flywheel effects. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

Analysis
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have querey regarding reuseful energy from system.
Our system is big cylinder (1000mmφ x 1000mm width) having mass of 500kg is rotating 500rpm to do function.It consumes power 4kw continiously
My curiosity is since cylinder is constantly rotating can we attach some dynamo accessories to generate power?
Wheather attachment and generating power is possible?
Can it we significant magnitude ?

any case studies in this field ?sites?

Thanks,
Prakash
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you want to attach a dynamo to get 1kW out, then you'd need to uprate your motor to put an extra 1kW in (plus some more for losses).

You won't get more energy out of this device than you put in.
 
Analysis said:
Our system is big cylinder (1000mmφ x 1000mm width) having mass of 500kg is rotating 500rpm to do function.It consumes power 4kw continiously
My curiosity is since cylinder is constantly rotating can we attach some dynamo accessories to generate power?
Wheather attachment and generating power is possible?

that 4kW is consumed against the losses, ie friction losses, viscous drag etc, it is not driving it, if you attach a power producing device, it ll increase the load on your system, then you need to increase the input to keep the shaft rotating at 500rpm.
 
brewnog said:
If you want to attach a dynamo to get 1kW out, then you'd need to uprate your motor to put an extra 1kW in (plus some more for losses).

You won't get more energy out of this device than you put in.


Thanks for your comments.But still i am not clear.
Of course you might be correct but i am not getting fully.
I will brief about my system.A big cylinder fitted with shaft (in central) and this rotates 500 rpm.Cotton is fed over one half quadrant in the outer periphery,my doubt is how power consumes? to rotate that much cylinder(wt 500kg) to overcome inertial resistance or to get over the cotton resistance (cotton is pass thro big cylinder and another rotary system) or to both.

Also if we attach in coils over outer periphery of the central shaft one end, while rotating this shaft flux will not create? and can't the power will produce?cant it generate even 0.5kw?why the input load is increased?

Thanks
Prakash
If we consider motor rotor assumption is not correct?
 
What does it matter how the power is dissipated by the machine? Heck, leave the machine out of this, then all you are left with is a motor driving a generator.

It takes power to drive a generator because a generator is converting mechanical power to electrical power. Magnets push electrons around, and that requires physical force.

If this were not so, we'd already have perpetual motion machines generating all of our power. Again, conservation of energy prevents this.
 
russ_watters said:
What does it matter how the power is dissipated by the machine? Heck, leave the machine out of this, then all you are left with is a motor driving a generator.

It takes power to drive a generator because a generator is converting mechanical power to electrical power. Magnets push electrons around, and that requires physical force.

If this were not so, we'd already have perpetual motion machines generating all of our power. Again, conservation of energy prevents this.



Hai

Yes i am agree that if we get around coil over shaft it will restrict and this will proportionately increase the input.

But while rotating mass of 500kg any flywheel effect can we get?
Also this flywheel effect cannot useful energy out?

Prakash
 
No, the flywheel effect stores energy, it doesn't continuously generate it. You only get energy out of a flywheel when you slow it down.
 
russ_watters said:
No, the flywheel effect stores energy, it doesn't continuously generate it. You only get energy out of a flywheel when you slow it down.

Thank you for your guidance.
 
  • #10
russ_watters said:
No, the flywheel effect stores energy, it doesn't continuously generate it. You only get energy out of a flywheel when you slow it down.

Therefore, you could possibly get some energy out of the system when you switch the machine off and slow down the "flywheel" if it could be connected to a dynamo. You would probably need a clutch so that you could engage the dynamo as soon as you switch off the machine. I doubt that the amount of power received would be very much in comparison to what you put in over a day of the machine being on, but you may be able to use it to power some lights or store it in a battery to be used in the starting of the machine the next day.

Hope that helps.
 
  • #11
redargon said:
Therefore, you could possibly get some energy out of the system when you switch the machine off and slow down the "flywheel" if it could be connected to a dynamo. You would probably need a clutch so that you could engage the dynamo as soon as you switch off the machine. I doubt that the amount of power received would be very much in comparison to what you put in over a day of the machine being on, but you may be able to use it to power some lights or store it in a battery to be used in the starting of the machine the next day.

Hope that helps.

Thanks for your comments.Hands of to your idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K