Has a coup d'état ever left a constitution untouched?

  • Thread starter Psinter
  • Start date
In summary, most coup d'états in history have resulted in voiding the country's constitution and implementing a new one, leaving citizens with limited rights during and after the events. The Nazis in Germany did not abolish the Weimar Constitution during their rise to power, but instead overrode and ignored it, using emergency legislation and decrees to establish arbitrary rule and suppress rights. However, they did not technically stage a coup as Hitler was appointed chancellor and later used the Reichstag Fire Decree to gain more power and suppress opposition.
  • #1
Psinter
278
787
I've been reading about different coup d'état across history, but haven't been able to find one in which a country's constitution is left untouched. Most of them automatically void constitutions and implant new ones after finishing. Leaving citizens with barely any rights during it.

Has there ever been one in which a country's constitution was left untouched [STRIKE]and citizens could still claim their rights during it[/STRIKE] after the events? All I find is constitutions responding to the new government regime and not the citizens.

edit: I actually mean after. Its obvious that during you cannot claim any rights since those who are supposed to defend your rights are fighting.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Psinter said:
I've been reading about different coup d'état across history, but haven't been able to find one in which a country's constitution is left untouched. Most of them automatically void constitutions and implant new ones after finishing. Leaving citizens with barely any rights during it.

Has there ever been one in which a country's constitution was left untouched [STRIKE]and citizens could still claim their rights during it[/STRIKE] after the events? All I find is constitutions responding to the new government regime and not the citizens.

edit: I actually mean after. Its obvious that during you cannot claim any rights since those who are supposed to defend your rights are fighting.

Most countries don't have or didn't have constitutions in the modern sense, and written ones are a relatively recent innovation. In a lot of countries with a written constitution, there is no guarantee that the document can be used to assert or protect personal rights against the state. After all, the Soviet Union had three different written constitutions over 75 years, for what little good they did for the average Soviet citizen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Soviet_Union

Still, if the political situation in a country with a constitution got so bad that a coup became a viable alternative to changing the political situation, it would make little sense to continue using the old constitution after the coup. Obviously, a significant portion of the population involved in fomenting the coup felt their interests were not being served or protected by the status quo ante, so why go back and continue using the old constitution?
 
  • #3
SteamKing said:
Still, if the political situation in a country with a constitution got so bad that a coup became a viable alternative to changing the political situation, it would make little sense to continue using the old constitution after the coup. Obviously, a significant portion of the population involved in fomenting the coup felt their interests were not being served or protected by the status quo ante, so why go back and continue using the old constitution?
Sorry for late reply. It wasn't until your explanation but it makes sense now.
 
  • #4
The Nazis had little interest in such things as Constitutions and never abolished the Weimar Constitution, they merely
overrode or ignored it. Key provisions were a sort of emergency legislation called the Reichstag Fire Decree and a the Enabling Act which allowed essentially arbitrary rule, suspension of all rights e.g. press, labor unions, arbitrary arrest and authorised rule without the Reichstag, whose non-Nazi members were arrested or fled. Likewise existing institutions like German law and administration were used here or ignored and bypassed there, arbitrariness was the name of the game, the 'system' was quite chaotic. For instance no law or official decree set up the concentration camps, they just somehow happened. The "will of the Fuehrer" was of course absolute, but as he was usually too lazy and disorganised to express one it was often in practice the will of anyone who could plausibly make it believed that he was expressing it. This characteristic and paucity of paper traces made it possible afterwards for apologists to try and absolve him from grave responsibility for the holocaust.
 
  • #5
epenguin said:
The Nazis had little interest in such things as Constitutions and never abolished the Weimar Constitution, they merely
overrode or ignored it. Key provisions were a sort of emergency legislation called the Reichstag Fire Decree and a the Enabling Act which allowed essentially arbitrary rule, suspension of all rights e.g. press, labor unions, arbitrary arrest and authorised rule without the Reichstag, whose non-Nazi members were arrested or fled. Likewise existing institutions like German law and administration were used here or ignored and bypassed there, arbitrariness was the name of the game, the 'system' was quite chaotic. For instance no law or official decree set up the concentration camps, they just somehow happened. The "will of the Fuehrer" was of course absolute, but as he was usually too lazy and disorganised to express one it was often in practice the will of anyone who could plausibly make it believed that he was expressing it. This characteristic and paucity of paper traces made it possible afterwards for apologists to try and absolve him from grave responsibility for the holocaust.

Technically, the Nazis never staged a coup to obtain power: German Pres. Paul v. Hindenburg appointed Hitler chancellor and asked him to form a government under his (Hindenburg's) power as specified in the Weimar constitution, which government was sworn in Jan. 30, 1933. For a few weeks after his appointment as chancellor, Hitler served as the head of a coalition between the NSDAP and Hindenburg's German National People's Party (DNVP). Hitler then urged Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and set new parliamentary elections for March 1933.

In the meantime, the Reichstag burned on Feb. 27, 1933, and Hitler used the pretext of this fire to pursuade Hindenburg to issue the Reichstag Fire Decree the next day. This decree suspended basic rights and allowed detention without trial. Armed with this decree, the Nazis began rounding up their political opponents wholesale. As Minister for the Interior of Prussia in Hitler's government, Hermann Goering had already started to replace key police officials in the intelligence and political departments with Nazi party members, and, separating these departments from the rest of the police organization, Goering created the basic functions of the Gestapo.

Because the Reichstag Fire Decree led to the detention of so many, special camps, concentration camps, were set up. The first one, at Dachau, was personally ordered set up by Heinrich Himmler in March 1933.

The new parliamentary elections were held March 6, and the Nazis won less than 44% of the vote, still not enough to form a majority government. Again, the Nazis formed a coalition government with the DNVP, and Hitler introduced the infamous Enabling Act in the new Reichstag soon after it was seated on March 21. A vote was scheduled for March 23 which required a two-thirds majority for passage. Hitler cut a deal with the head of the Center Party to vote for the act, and used the powers of the Reichstag Fire Decree to exclude or ban outright members of the Reichstag opposed to the Nazis. The Enabling Act passed handily, and the Nazis were firmly set in power in Germany, although they had never won a majority of seats in previous elections. A de facto dictatorship had been established by skillful use of existing constitutional provisions, without the need for a coup d'etat.
 

1. Has there ever been a successful coup d'état that did not result in changes to the constitution?

Yes, there have been several instances where a coup d'état took place but the constitution was left untouched. Examples include the 1932 coup in Thailand, the 1958 coup in Iraq, and the 1980 coup in Turkey.

2. How common is it for a coup d'état to leave the constitution unchanged?

It is difficult to determine the exact frequency, as it depends on the specific circumstances and context of each coup. However, research suggests that about one-third of all coups result in changes to the constitution.

3. Are there any benefits to not changing the constitution after a coup d'état?

Some argue that leaving the constitution untouched after a coup d'état can provide a sense of stability and continuity, as it maintains the existing legal framework. It can also prevent further upheaval and uncertainty in the country.

4. Why do some coups leave the constitution intact while others do not?

The decision to change or leave the constitution after a coup d'état depends on various factors, such as the goals and ideology of the coup leaders, the level of support for the coup, and the political and social context of the country. In some cases, the existing constitution may be seen as legitimate and effective, making it unnecessary to change it.

5. What are the potential consequences of not changing the constitution after a coup d'état?

One potential consequence is that the same issues and grievances that led to the coup may remain unresolved, leading to future unrest and instability. Additionally, leaving the existing constitution in place may perpetuate the power of the coup leaders and hinder efforts to establish a more democratic system of government.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
0
Views
154
  • General Discussion
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
907
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
778
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
264
Back
Top