Have you noticed deliberate microexpressions in TV personalities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observation of deliberate microexpressions used by TV personalities, exploring the intentionality behind these gestures and their effects on audience perception. It touches on historical practices of gesturing and its applications in communication and negotiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that TV personalities consciously use exaggerated microexpressions to direct attention and communicate emotions.
  • Others note that not all actors, politicians, or newscasters employ these exaggerated gestures, and they may not always carry negative connotations.
  • A participant references historical practices of gesturing, linking them to Greek theater and suggesting that exaggerated microexpressions may have originated from theatrical masks or makeup.
  • Another participant discusses the application of body gesturing in mediation and negotiation, emphasizing its role as an exploratory tool rather than a means of coercion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the intentionality and implications of microexpressions, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to historical texts and practices, but the assumptions underlying the use of gestures and their interpretations are not fully explored or agreed upon.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
I have noticed TV personalities affecting what I assume would otherwise be microexpressions. These gestures seem consciously used to direct attention, communicate emotion (like an "applause" sign) or invite intimacy.

Not all actors, politicians or newscasters use these exaggerations, and such "microexpressions" are not necessarily negative in character. Indeed, I am curious as to whether others have noticed similar, purposeful facial language which is usually subliminal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
I have noticed TV personalities affecting what I assume would otherwise be microexpressions. These gestures seem consciously used to direct attention, communicate emotion (like an "applause" sign) or invite intimacy.

Not all actors, politicians or newscasters use these exaggerations, and such "microexpressions" are not necessarily negative in character. Indeed, I am curious as to whether others have noticed similar, purposeful facial language which is usually subliminal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chironomia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_Austin

Using gestures and facial expressions to influence audiences is an old art, extensively cultivated by the Greeks. These references to chironomia will answer many of your questions. In his chapter on the countenance alone, Gilbert collects observations from Cicero, Demosthenes, Aristotle, Pliny and others on the expression of the eyes, eyebrows, forehead, cheeks and mouth. But the study of gesture is most extensive and thorough. I'm fortunate to have a copy of the book.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Thanks for the references, Dotini.

Exaggerated microexpressions, as suggested by one of the articles, originated as masks or makeup, like those in Greek theater.
 
There are applications of body gesturing as a communications and investigative skill in the fields of mediation and interest based negotiation. But gesturing, related to active listening, in these areas is generally used more as an exploratory tool rather than one used to coerce or influence another.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
671
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
506K