Help identifying a length for this paper edge

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Edge Length Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a lab's experiment aboard the ISS involving the coalescence of water droplets. The researcher is struggling to determine the size of the water droplets due to inconsistent measurement metrics. A potential solution involves identifying the dimensions of a paper towel used by astronauts, specifically the size of the serrated triangles on the towel, which may help establish a scale for the experiment. Suggestions include checking local public restrooms for similar towels and utilizing the standard dimensions of serrated cuts. The researcher expresses uncertainty about how to obtain this information from NASA, given that the wipe was not part of their payload. They are encouraged to explore video metadata for clues and consider reaching out to NASA with specific questions regarding the materials used during the experiment. The importance of including measurement scales in future experiments is also emphasized to avoid similar issues.
member 428835
Hi PF!

Two years ago my lab launched experiments aboard the ISS. The experiment was simple: place two water droplets on a substrate, set camera above the drops, and watch them coalesce. However, the exact size of the drops is unknown (approximately 1 cm radii, though this number is debated). So I'm analyzing this data and have done A TON of work to try and back out a length scale, but no two metrics agree within 5% of each other, so I'm not overly confident. Now I may have to scrap the entire project, but before I do, this might be the key: does anyone know the size of the corrugated "jagged triangles" at the end of this wipe being used to dry the surface? An astronaut is holding it, and the drop is total about 20 mL volume (few cm long) to give you a guess.
Screen Shot 2022-02-04 at 3.36.15 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: I just found something and I THINK each triangle base might be 15/37 = 0.405 cm. But let me know what you think.
 
How could we possibly be able to answer this? Ask the astronaut.

But in the future, put a measurement scale in the experiment and record the specs/dimensions of the camera.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, robphy and BillTre
If that is a standard three panel brown paper towel, then (as far as I know) all use the same number of teeth per inch. It's called a serrated cut, and was the standard cutoff on towel folders up to about 15-20 years ago. Check out the local public restrooms for paper towels. You might get lucky.

The industry got away from serrated cutoffs because newer, tougher towel material is difficult to cut using serrated cutoffs. Much of my engineering career was working with cutoff systems.
 
  • Like
Likes member 428835
russ_watters said:
How could we possibly be able to answer this? Ask the astronaut.

But in the future, put a measurement scale in the experiment and record the specs/dimensions of the camera.
I wasn't in the control room. Wasn't even supposed to be my experiment, but my advisor sadly passed away, leaving the project for me to handle.

But regarding how to answer this: I think I found a solution so...
 
jrmichler said:
If that is a standard three panel brown paper towel, then (as far as I know) all use the same number of teeth per inch. It's called a serrated cut, and was the standard cutoff on towel folders up to about 15-20 years ago. Check out the local public restrooms for paper towels. You might get lucky.

The industry got away from serrated cutoffs because newer, tougher towel material is difficult to cut using serrated cutoffs. Much of my engineering career was working with cutoff systems.
This is helpful! What do you think of this?
 
Okay, so I'm pretty sure the triangle bases are 4,5, or 6 mm long. Like, 100% sure, but which...
 
You said no two methods agree within 5% of each other, but if they all agree within 15% of each other, you can figure it out by process of elimination
 
Any reason you can't show us any other pics? You've got enough video to do your experiment, so you can get more pics, but maybe we'll see something in them that you've missed.
 
  • #10
I find it hard to believe NASA doesn't know what exact materials were present on/available on/sent to ISS.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #11
Borek said:
I find it hard to believe NASA doesn't know what exact materials were present on/available on/sent to ISS.
These experiments were conducted in late 2020. The wipe they used was not in our payload. I have absolutely no clue how to ask them for this info.
 
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
Any reason you can't show us any other pics? You've got enough video to do your experiment, so you can get more pics, but maybe we'll see something in them that you've missed.
Sadly each video was about 1 minute. This is literally the only shot I have (well, a 3 second clip)
 
  • #13

Similar threads

Back
Top