Help with DE and UNIT STEP FUNCTION

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving a unit step function, specifically the equation x'' + 2x' + x = 10t*u(t) with initial conditions x(0)=1 and x'(0)=0. Participants explore different methods for solving this equation, including traditional integration and the use of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to ignore the unit step function and solve the differential equation through regular integration.
  • Another participant suggests using the Laplace transform to solve the equation, indicating that the initial conditions provided imply this method is appropriate.
  • A different participant expresses a dislike for the Laplace transform and proposes an alternative method involving solving two separate problems, one for the homogeneous equation and another for the non-homogeneous part.
  • Another participant reflects on their preference for the Laplace transform, suggesting that familiarity with a method can lead to its repeated application, even if it may not be the most efficient approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing preferences for solving the differential equation, with some advocating for the Laplace transform and others preferring alternative methods. No consensus is reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved considerations regarding the treatment of the unit step function and the implications of the initial conditions on the chosen method of solution.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and practitioners interested in differential equations, particularly those involving piecewise functions and initial value problems, may find this discussion relevant.

tung
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure how to solve a differential equation with unit step function, for example:

x'' + 2x' + x = 10t*u(t), where x(0)=1 and x'(0)=0

Do I just ignore the u(t) and solve it regularly by normal integration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you learned the Laplace transform yet? If you have, transform both sides of the DE, and express L(x), then find the inverse Laplace of that. The fact that they gave you x(0) and x'(0) hints strongly that you should use that.

To do it without Laplace you'd have to separate the DE for 2 separate intervals, one for which u(t) = 1 and another for u(t)=0, for different intervals of t.
 
I really dislike the Laplace Transform! Use Defennnder's second method; solve two problems:

First solve x" + 2x' + x = 0, x(0)= 1, x'(0)= 0. Call that x1(t).

Then solve x'' + 2x' + x = 10t, x(0)= 1, x'(0)= 0. Call that x2(t).

x(t)= x1(t) for t< 0 , x2 for t> 0. Of course, they are the same at t= 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL, well I've grown used to Laplace transform. I guess it's because once you learned something new you'll always try to find ways of applying, even if it results in a less efficient way of doing things. But anyway, it looks as though this problem was catered specially for the Laplace transform.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K