Help with intuition concering braket sandwich

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hymne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of the bracket sandwich notation , particularly in the context of quantum mechanics. The user expresses confusion regarding the application of a time-dependent operator on a state vector at a non-corresponding time, specifically in the Schrödinger picture. The user concludes that the action of the position operator in this context lacks a clear physical interpretation, distinguishing it from a measurement of position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger picture of quantum evolution
  • Knowledge of operator theory in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of transition amplitudes and inner products
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the interpretation of time-dependent operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the differences between the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures
  • Explore the concept of transition amplitudes in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the physical implications of measurement in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and researchers interested in operator theory and the interpretation of quantum states.

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
Hi there!
I have a hard time getting any sense out of what the sandwich:

<q'', t'' | Q(t1) | q', t'>
where t' < t1 < t'', actually means..

If we skip Q(t1) we get the usual transition amplitude. But how should i interpret this when we use an operator that is timedependet but act on a statevector in the "wrong time"?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
IMO, it doesn't have a nice interpretation. In the Schrödinger picture, you are starting in a position eigenstate at time t', evolving for a time t1-t', acting with the position operator, the evolving for a time t''-t1, then taking the inner product with another position eigenstate. But "acting with the position operator" does not have a nice physical interpretation; in particular, it's not the same as measuring the position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K