Hölder Continuous Maps from ##R## to a Metric Space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the properties of Hölder continuous maps from the real numbers to a metric space, specifically examining the conditions under which such a map must be constant. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if a function ##f : \mathbb{R} \to X## satisfies the Hölder condition with exponent ##\gamma > 1##, then it must be constant.
  • Another participant suggests a strategy involving dividing the interval ##[a,b]## into smaller segments if ##f(a) \neq f(b)##, implying that this could lead to a contradiction.
  • A third participant notes the nature of the thread as a "Problem of the Week" (POTW) and encourages a specific user to share their solution.
  • One participant expresses reluctance to provide solutions, indicating they have moved beyond the typical university student level.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the solution to the problem, and multiple viewpoints regarding the approach to the proof are present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not clarify the assumptions necessary for the proof or the implications of the Hölder condition in this context. The mathematical steps required to reach a conclusion remain unresolved.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Let ##\gamma > 1##. If ##(X,d)## is a metric space and ##f : \mathbb{R} \to X## satisfies ##d(f(x),f(y)) \le |x - y|^\gamma## for all ##x,y\in \mathbb{R}##, show that ##f## must be constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: If ##a<b## with ##f(a)\neq f(b)##, chop up the interval ##[a,b]## into many small pieces.
 
Since this is a POTW, if you have a solution, @Infrared, please don't hesitate to post it! :-)
 
Oh I generally don't give solutions here because I'm past the "university student" level,

Without loss of generality, I just check that ##f(0)=f(1)## to make the algebra nicer.
Let ##0=t_0<t_1<\ldots<t_n=1## be the partition ##t_k=\frac{k}{n}.## The given condition is ##d(f(t_i),f(t_{i+1})\leq 1/n^{\gamma}.## Summing over all consecutive ##t_i## and using the triangle inequality gives

$$d(f(0),f(1))\leq\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} d(f(t_k),f(t_{k+1}))\leq \frac{n}{n^{\gamma}}=n^{1-\gamma}.$$

As ##n\to\infty,## the right term goes to 0, so the distance between ##f(0)## and ##f(1)## has to be zero too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Euge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K