How can I design a linear to rotational crank mechanism without using gears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter D9 XTC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crank Rotational
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on designing a crank mechanism that converts linear movement to rotational motion without using gears. A uni-directional drive is suggested as a potential solution, allowing for linear movement to be transformed into rotation while preventing reverse motion. The user emphasizes the need for reciprocating linear movement and expresses concerns about the crank's ability to maintain consistent rotation at low speeds. A suggestion is made to use a long-stroke crank to avoid issues with top dead center (TDC) or bottom dead center (BDC) that could cause the mechanism to get stuck. The conversation highlights the challenges of synchronizing input forces with the rotational shaft angle.
D9 XTC
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a crank that can give me linear movement to rotation (not the other way around).

There is a component that I'm aware of called a uni-directional drive that turns rotation movement in either direction into movement in only on direction... stick a rack in the mix and there is linear movement to rotational. The only thing is is that I don't want to have to deal with gears.

Anyone have any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
D9 XTC said:
I'm looking for a crank that can give me linear movement to rotation (not the other way around).

There is a component that I'm aware of called a uni-directional drive that turns rotation movement in either direction into movement in only on direction... stick a rack in the mix and there is linear movement to rotational. The only thing is is that I don't want to have to deal with gears.

Anyone have any ideas?

Isn't clear what you want that makes a conventional crank unsuitable. Do you want to prevent the rotating part from driving the linear part? Is the linear movement in one direction or reciprocating? Do you need it to be self-starting in any position? A more linear force-torque relationship?
 
My bad

For my application the linear part will drive rotational part. There's no need to prevent the rotational part from driving the linear part but it would be interesting to see if you have ideas for that. The linear movement has to be reciprocating for the crank to work. Not sure what you mean by self starting in any position and linear forve-torque relationship.

The reason why I think a crank with the usual config won't work is because the speeds I'm running are relatively low. Seems like the crank may not be able to rotate the shaft it's connected to the same direction all of the time.
 
Last edited:
D9 XTC said:
The reason why I think a crank with the usual config won't work is because the speeds I'm running are relatively low. Seems like the crank may not be able to rotate the shaft it's connected to the same direction all of the time.

Ah, gotcha. That's what I meant by "self starting", which is a term I just made up :P

How about the uni-directional drive, driven by a crank that has such a long stroke that it never completes a full revolution, so it never hits TDC or BDC where it might get stuck.

I suppose you have some arbitrary input force that can't be synchronized with the shaft's angle the way it is in an engine.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K